|
ajdevies -> RE: Webrings (3/15/2003 10:57:40)
|
Hi Mike, Thanks for the links. I searched OutFront and read all that before I posted. Unfortunately it only partially answered my questions. The two items I posted about weren' t really covered in those threads. One thread was concerned about hosting a webring, with a general consensus of it being inappropriate, at least from the main site. The other thread was more about click-for-profit links. The specific arts-oriented webring my client wants to join already exists and my client is more concerned with web-based exposure - i.e. getting their information out there so visitors can add the museum to their itineraries. There is also an element of local history to my client' s website which they wish to promote. I' m concerned about WebRing' s TOS: quote:
" 8. CONTENT SUBMITTED OR MADE AVAILABLE FOR INCLUSION ON THE SERVICE WebRing does not claim ownership of Content you submit or make available for inclusion on the Service. However, with respect to Content you submit or make available for inclusion on publicly accessible areas of the Service, you grant WebRing the following world-wide, royalty free and non-exclusive license(s), as applicable: With respect to Content you submit or make available for inclusion on publicly accessible areas of WebRing, the license to use, distribute, reproduce, modify, adapt, publicly perform and publicly display such Content on the Service solely for the purposes of providing and promoting the specific WebRing Ring to which such Content was submitted or made available. This license exists only for as long as you elect to continue to include such Content on the Service and will terminate at the time you remove or WebRing removes such Content from the Service." I added the underlines for emphasis because that' s what scares me. I' m not an attorney and I have advised my client to seek counsel with regard to this. I' m concerned, as a web programmer, about WebRing' s co-opting my copyright to the work I did for the museum. I would appear that I am giving WebRing the right to MODIFY, ADAPT, etc. my design and programming. What if they do that in such a way it is incompatible with the museum' s mission or audience or community standing? This is a non-profit organization funded by state, county and local grants, donations, memberships and token admission fees. They could lose all public funding and my copyrighted work is pirated. Neither the museum nor I have the financial means to pursue these possibilities through legal channels. Am I exaggerating the potential for this to happen? Has anyone HAD this happen to them? Should I advise the museum to reject the web ring out-of-hand? Also, all the pop-ups/unders don' t " feel" appropriate for a small non-profit fine arts museum with a local and international legacy. Again, am I exaggerating? I' m really looking for feedback on the appropriateness of putting a not-for-profit, publicly-funded fine arts museum into a webring that throws pop-ups at you left and right. IMHO it feels like swatting mosquitos during a garden wedding. Maybe that last sentence answers my own question with regard to the advertising issue. Mike, maybe I should see if I can find an attorney willing to give the TOS a quick once-over for a minimal charge. I was hoping some of the more experience OFF members had been down this road. I' ve got several days before I have to respond to the museum on this. As I work at generating this post I see my own opinions more clearly. Maybe I' m just looking for reassurances.
|
|
|
|