navigation
a webmaster learning community
     Home    Register     Search      Help      Login    
FrontPage Alternative
Sponsors

Shopping Cart Software
Ecommerce software integrated into Frontpage, Dreamweaver and Golive templates. No monthly fees and available in ASP and PHP versions.

Website Templates
We also have a wide selection of Dreamweaver, Expression Web and Frontpage templates as well as webmaster tools and CSS layouts.

Frontpage website templates
Creative Website Templates for FrontPage, Dreamweaver, Flash, SwishMax

Search Forums
 

Advanced search
Recent Posts

 Todays Posts
 Most Active posts
 Posts since last visit
 My Recent Posts
 Mark posts read

 

Can' t Understand Why Site Is So Different in Netscape!

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
Printable Version 

All Forums >> Web Development >> Microsoft FrontPage Help >> Can' t Understand Why Site Is So Different in Netscape!
Page: [1]
 
Mike_R

 

Posts: 124
Joined: 1/15/2003
Status: offline

 
Can' t Understand Why Site Is So Different in Netscape! - 6/3/2003 18:12:16   
Boy, this is really frustrating. My entire site works beautifully in IE. I try to view and use it in Netscrap (sp.) and everything goes awry. In Netscape:

--it loads slower
--Frontpage borders which fit tightly around the perimeter of my cells in IE are missized
--line spacing is out of control (bullets, for expample, are twice as far apart)
--after submitting some of my forms, Netscape locks up when I click the BACK button that I created on my confirmation page. Actually, it seems to lock up the entire computer (and I have tried this on 2 computers).
--I have an Add to Cart button on my product pages that doesn' t even show up in Netscape--unbelievable!

Why can' t the whole world just use IE? How many people actually use Netscape?

Has anyone else experienced such? I expected that there would need to be some modifications for Netscape, but this is overwhelming. Thanks for any suggestions.

Mike_R
Ziggyzaz

 

Posts: 250
Joined: 5/29/2003
Status: offline

 
RE: Can' t Understand Why Site Is So Different in Netsc... - 6/3/2003 18:31:50   
Only 3% of the market uses Netscape, so i wouldn' t worry to much about your pages being off for the rest of the world.

_____________________________

Your Chicken is on Fire

(in reply to Mike_R)
Gil

 

Posts: 7533
From: North Carolina, USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Can' t Understand Why Site Is So Different in Netsc... - 6/3/2003 18:47:41   
quote:

How many people actually use Netscape


Depends. I find out in the " real world" very few, maybe 5 - 10% I work with a lot of Community Colleges and Universitys and find well over 50% use NN there.

One thing to keep in mind; Netscape parses valid html fine, it ' s the MS stuff that it doesn' t like. Test your site in NN and if it works there there' s a pretty good chance it' s valid.

_____________________________

Gil Harvey, 1947-2004

(in reply to Mike_R)
Mike_R

 

Posts: 124
Joined: 1/15/2003
Status: offline

 
RE: Can' t Understand Why Site Is So Different in Netsc... - 6/3/2003 19:33:12   
Do you know of a way to test my HTML to see what NN is interpreting as invalid? Since part of the problem is with my forms, I was thinking about doing the Spooky diet and seeing if that changed anything. But the line spacing is killing me. It looks horrible.

(in reply to Gil)
Ziggyzaz

 

Posts: 250
Joined: 5/29/2003
Status: offline

 
RE: Can' t Understand Why Site Is So Different in Netsc... - 6/3/2003 19:49:45   
Go into your HTML section of FP and copy and then paste it onto notepad, then save as .htm and open in NN. thats the only way that i can think of.

_____________________________

Your Chicken is on Fire

(in reply to Mike_R)
Gil

 

Posts: 7533
From: North Carolina, USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Can' t Understand Why Site Is So Different in Netsc... - 6/3/2003 21:04:46   
To check for valid code -> http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/

Posting the URL here would be a big help also :)

_____________________________

Gil Harvey, 1947-2004

(in reply to Mike_R)
Mike_R

 

Posts: 124
Joined: 1/15/2003
Status: offline

 
RE: Can' t Understand Why Site Is So Different in Netsc... - 6/3/2003 21:50:57   
Thanks, Gil. To test it out, I ran a validation on my homepage, and it doesn' t look pretty. However, some of the comments made didn' t appear accurate. For example, it said once that <tr> wasn' t a valid tag at one point. It was. There was a close tag for the previous row and this began the next. It also had a closing tag. Very strange. Anyway, I' m going to keep looking at this tonight. Oh, and you asked for the URL, so here it is:

www.darncoolstuff.com

Thanks,

Mike R

(in reply to Gil)
Gil

 

Posts: 7533
From: North Carolina, USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Can' t Understand Why Site Is So Different in Netsc... - 6/3/2003 22:47:09   
OK, I didn' t have time to do a deep look - BUT, you have a TR set at 769 px and the TD,s in the first row are 166 + 342 + 262 that' s a total of 770 then the second row is 342 + 429 that' s 771 Netscape doesn' t like it when the math doesn' t total up :) IE is Microsoft and they can' t add so....... :)

_____________________________

Gil Harvey, 1947-2004

(in reply to Mike_R)
gorilla

 

Posts: 2974
From: Denmark
Status: offline

 
RE: Can' t Understand Why Site Is So Different in Netsc... - 6/4/2003 0:52:40   
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ziggyzaz

Only 3% of the market uses Netscape, so i wouldn' t worry to much about your pages being off for the rest of the world.


That can be a somewhat misleading statistic to put it mildly. You haven' t mentioned that browser share for IE is greatly increased by the fact that it is supplied as standard with most new boxes. Moreover browser share can be highly sector specific less than 2% of users in bioresearch fields such as bioinformatics use IE. Most of them use NN4.78 running (Unix) or something like Konqueror or Opera in a Linux environment.

Knowing your target audiences' browser preference is essential.

Mike_R:


WRT to the difference between how some browsers render things - I can sympathise but Internet Explorer is a very " forgiving" browser. Most of the other browsers insist on standards compliant code. Therefore all browsers including IE (if Microsoft stick to what they say they plan for it) will become stricter about how they render your pages.

The bottom line I think is to test in at least the following:

Internet explorer
Mozilla
Netscape
Opera

You can get a copy of tidygui.exe here:

http://www.dewassoc.com/support/useful/tidygui.htm

You might also like to check this link:

http://www.htmlvalidator.com/lite/

Freja

< Message edited by gorilla -- 6/4/2003 12:55:55 AM >


_____________________________

Mháircaish

Signature self-censored to protect the sensibilities of the thin-skinned :).

May we never confuse honest dissent with disloyal subversion. – Dwight D. Eisenhower



(in reply to Ziggyzaz)
Mike_R

 

Posts: 124
Joined: 1/15/2003
Status: offline

 
RE: Can' t Understand Why Site Is So Different in Netsc... - 6/4/2003 11:14:31   
Gil and Gorilla, I have questions for both of you.

Gil: I sort of see what you mean about the table row/data size issue. I went in and corrected this on my PWS and will update the site tonight. Now, if I understand correctly, the width of the content of the cells in a row can be less than the total table width. Content often doesn' t fill cells. The concern is that the total width of the data in a cell not exceed the cell width and the total data width of the cells in a row not exceed the table width. Is that right?


Gorilla: Can I run Mozilla, Opera and the other browsers on one computer without any conflict problems? Also, are these free browsers that I can download?

Finally, it' s interesting to note that I ran my homepage through the validator you gave me, and it only came back with 3 tag errors that can easily be corrected. I wonder why there' s such a difference between that validator and the one Gil gave me. Just curious.

Mike_R

(in reply to gorilla)
Gil

 

Posts: 7533
From: North Carolina, USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Can' t Understand Why Site Is So Different in Netsc... - 6/4/2003 11:24:17   
quote:

Now, if I understand correctly, the width of the content of the cells in a row can be less than the total table width. Content often doesn' t fill cells. The concern is that the total width of the data in a cell not exceed the cell width and the total data width of the cells in a row not exceed the table width. Is that right?


No, math is a fairly exact thing - the rows should add up to exactly the TR .
One thing a lot of people do is set all but one TD and let the other fill the area.
Example:
<table width=" 100%" >
<tr>
<td width=" 100" >content</td>
<td width=" 500" >content</td>
<td>content</td>
</tr>
</table>
This way the left mosst cell will fill whatever is left over


quote:

I wonder why there' s such a difference between that validator and the one Gil gave me. Just curious.


Well, since you are misssing the required DTD tag - the validator is guessing what to validate against. One might be using 4.0 strict and the other 4.0 transitional

_____________________________

Gil Harvey, 1947-2004

(in reply to Mike_R)
Mike_R

 

Posts: 124
Joined: 1/15/2003
Status: offline

 
RE: Can' t Understand Why Site Is So Different in Netsc... - 6/4/2003 12:52:03   
Oh boy, now I' m more confused than ever. Maybe this partially a jargon problem. When you say, " the TR," are you speaking of the row in a table? I am assuming that there are tables which consist of rows which contain data.

Next, in your HTML example, wouldn' t it be the rightmost cell that fills what' s left over. The 100 and 500 are used for widths in pixels and are thus fixed widths. Only the last cell (td) is undefined for width, so it would fill the remainder. Right?

Let me check my understanding: The width of a row, regardless of how many cells there are on that row, is defined by the width established in the table tag (<table width=" 770" >. Thus, each row of the table should equal exactly 770. The total widths of the cells (td) in a row must equal the width of the row as defined in the table tag. Right, I hope?

My question before about cell contents being less than the TR may have been a little unclear. I think I was confusing the width established by TD (<td width=" 770" >, for example) and the actual size of the contents of the TD. What I mean is that you can have an image in a cell that doesn' t occupy the entire cell. The same holds true with text. You could have a 770 row with only one cell (TD) whose contents could simply be the text " contents." This doesn' t fill the row. However, the td width would still be set to 770.

I know about the missing doctype tag. I thought 4.01 transitional was assumed without it. My bad. I plan to add the transitional tag to all pages this week.

Mike R

< Message edited by Mike_R -- 6/4/2003 12:53:42 PM >

(in reply to Gil)
Gil

 

Posts: 7533
From: North Carolina, USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Can' t Understand Why Site Is So Different in Netsc... - 6/4/2003 15:14:34   
quote:

When you say, " the TR," are you speaking of the row in a table?


Right: A table is <td>, a row is <tr. and a cell is <td>

quote:

I am assuming that there are tables which consist of rows which contain data.


Nope, only cells <td> can contain data. A one cell table still has to have a table and a row tag set - like:
<table>
<tr>
<td>
Data here
</td>
</tr>
</table>


quote:

Only the last cell (td) is undefined for width, so it would fill the remainder. Right?


Right!

quote:

My question before about cell contents being less than the TR may have been a little unclear. I think I was confusing the width established by TD (<td width=" 770" >, for example) and the actual size of the contents of the TD. What I mean is that you can have an image in a cell that doesn' t occupy the entire cell. The same holds true with text. You could have a 770 row with only one cell (TD) whose contents could simply be the text " contents." This doesn' t fill the row. However, the td width would still be set to 770.


Right again.

quote:

I know about the missing doctype tag. I thought 4.01 transitional was assumed without it.


Maybe, maybe not! Depends on the validator. After so long at this business I' ve learned not to assume anything...

_____________________________

Gil Harvey, 1947-2004

(in reply to Mike_R)
gorilla

 

Posts: 2974
From: Denmark
Status: offline

 
RE: Can' t Understand Why Site Is So Different in Netsc... - 6/5/2003 11:23:18   
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike_R


Gorilla: Can I run Mozilla, Opera and the other browsers on one computer without any conflict problems? Also, are these free browsers that I can download?



Yes to all above questions. The only thing to be sure of is to say " No" if asked whether you wish to make any of them your default browser unless you wish that to be the case.

You can get them from their own sites such
opera.com
mozilla.org
netscape.com
etc

This place has archived copies of previous versions:

http://browsers.evolt.org/





quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike_R

Finally, it' s interesting to note that I ran my homepage through the validator you gave me, and it only came back with 3 tag errors that can easily be corrected. I wonder why there' s such a difference between that validator and the one Gil gave me. Just curious.

Mike_R


Different validators apply different levels of strictness, - always go for the most rigorous one :)



quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike_R


I know about the missing doctype tag. I thought 4.01 transitional was assumed without it. My bad. I plan to add the transitional tag to all pages this week.


Mike_R


It is a seriously good idea to always include a doctype. Make sure that the URL is absolute and correct.

I hope this helps you somewhat.

Freja

Post Scriptum: I forgot to mention that the excellent www.nonags.com has a section for browsers.

F

< Message edited by gorilla -- 6/5/2003 11:49:40 AM >


_____________________________

Mháircaish

Signature self-censored to protect the sensibilities of the thin-skinned :).

May we never confuse honest dissent with disloyal subversion. – Dwight D. Eisenhower



(in reply to Mike_R)
Mike_R

 

Posts: 124
Joined: 1/15/2003
Status: offline

 
RE: Can' t Understand Why Site Is So Different in Netsc... - 6/5/2003 12:22:05   
Thank you all so much. Gorilla, you said to " make sure that the URL is absolute and correct." What exactly do you mean? I am going to begin adding the DocTypes tonight to all my pages.

This is what I will be adding to the head tag of my pages, right?:

<!doctype html PUBLIC " -//W3C//DTD html 4.01 Transitional//EN" >

Mike_R

(in reply to gorilla)
gorilla

 

Posts: 2974
From: Denmark
Status: offline

 
RE: Can' t Understand Why Site Is So Different in Netsc... - 6/6/2003 10:26:55   
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike_R


This is what I will be adding to the head tag of my pages, right?:

<!doctype html PUBLIC " -//W3C//DTD html 4.01 Transitional//EN" >

Mike_R


That will suffice but see my posting below. I will do a longer explanation for you this weekend if you need it (but for now I have some greatgrandchildren and one of my grandchildren running around and need to attend to that.:))

Freja

< Message edited by gorilla -- 6/6/2003 10:41:51 AM >


_____________________________

Mháircaish

Signature self-censored to protect the sensibilities of the thin-skinned :).

May we never confuse honest dissent with disloyal subversion. – Dwight D. Eisenhower



(in reply to Mike_R)
gorilla

 

Posts: 2974
From: Denmark
Status: offline

 
RE: Can' t Understand Why Site Is So Different in Netsc... - 6/6/2003 10:40:35   
Postscriptum:


Use this -

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC " -//W3C//dtd HTML 4.0 transitional//EN"  " http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd" > 


THE DTD is the Document Type Declaration (dtd) it tells the visitor' s browser which version of the language your code complies with. BOth CSS features and the HTML feature set are dependent on it.

IE6 looks at the dtd to decide which version of HTML you are using, and will render things differently depending on that dtd.

Moreover IE5/Mac and Mozilla (deliberately) misrender pages without dtds as a temporary workaround for backwards compatibility purposes.

I always suggest to people in your situation that 4.0 or 4.1 Transitional is the dtd you want to be using at present as it will give you all the latest additions to HTML while still allowing pages with outdated code to display properly. Although I stand by my preference for strict. (See paragraph below:)

It is a good habit to get into as it is required for XHTML and XML. Moreover it forces you to write properly formed code. It is NOT difficult to do this indeed failing to do so will give you much angst. There is never any substitute for doing it right first time around.

F.

_____________________________

Mháircaish

Signature self-censored to protect the sensibilities of the thin-skinned :).

May we never confuse honest dissent with disloyal subversion. – Dwight D. Eisenhower



(in reply to Mike_R)
abbeyvet

 

Posts: 5095
From: Kilkenny Ireland
Status: offline

 
RE: Can' t Understand Why Site Is So Different in Netsc... - 6/6/2003 11:51:41   
Bear i mind too that while a validator will look for errors in HTML, it will not look for, or report on, errors such as table cells that do not add up correctly and so on.

_____________________________

Katherine

:: InKK Design :: InKK Domains

(in reply to Mike_R)
ApexWeb

 

Posts: 139
Joined: 6/27/2003
From: Flower Mound, Texas
Status: offline

 
RE: Can' t Understand Why Site Is So Different in Netsc... - 8/25/2003 21:51:55   
Surely there are some HTML validators out there that can correctly parse and validate a table! (If not, this is a good opportunity for one of us to write one, eh?)

_____________________________

Stephen Walker
Apex Web Solutions

(in reply to Mike_R)
gorilla

 

Posts: 2974
From: Denmark
Status: offline

 
RE: Can' t Understand Why Site Is So Different in Netsc... - 8/26/2003 14:14:17   
Use the w3c validation service.

But Stephen are you not somewhat ignoring an important point?

Either the person coding the site get it right or they don't. This is a simple binary solution set.

- If you haven't got it right then it needs to be fixed. Most often the errors are minor. Typically you need to check for example whether you've properly closed the tags, misstyped something slightly, or slightlty muddled the arithmetic. All of these are very easy mistakes to make, and to fix.

It is not validators that coders need to worry about it is UAs. Far too many people have relied for far too long on one particular UA - Internet Explorer - being a very "forgiving" UA. Often not realising that they are in fact triggering "quirks mode." Then when they encounter a UA that parses properly they wonder what's wrong with that browser!!! Answer "nothing is wrong with it - it is trying to work with defective code."

I emphasise UAs rather than browsers because browsers areonly one form of UA. Search bots are another and more modern search bots, like modern browsers are increasingly standards compliant. In other words they "choke" on bad code.

There isn't any greater aid to producing a usable table than sitting down with a pencil and paper and doing a very rough sketch with percentages or whichever unit of measurement you need to use such as pixels. - then check your arithmetic. Thus for example if you are using percentages and things add up to more than 100% then you are going to have problems.


Actually I take back that last paragraph, there is, it is for the preson coding a site to take responsibility for managing their code and getting it right. By all means use which ever tool or number of them, you like but don't rely on the tool. You need to know what the tool does - what the error messages mean etc.

As well as the links we gave to tidygui etc in posting above and the links towards end of this posting here's a nice little tool (free)

http://www.tafweb.com/tagcheck.html picks up the most common errors.

Actually all his software is good we've recommended all of it many times on Outfront.


We in the gorilla group keep on saying this. The days of malformed code being able to "pass muster" are very rapidly disappearing. Instead of looking for yet another software tool to fix it spend the time reading up the W3C specs and learn how to do it - that way you'll be much much more productive with the tools you choose to use because you will know what the are doing.


If you use the validator at w3c and click on the explain link for any errors it finds it gives useful and helpful information about what's wrong and on how to fix it.

http://validator.w3.org/

To validate css go here:

http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/

Those are the ONLY authoritative checkers and as Katherine rightly points out they don't check for things like arithmetical errors.

Produce well formed code and validate validate validate. That way you give UAs such as browsers a chance to do what they are meant to do. All UAs even explorer are moving to ever stricter compliance with W3C specs.

So while there is of course a learning period involved and as Mike-R has said it can be very frustrating. Nevertheless spending the time learning how to do it properly is time well spent. The previous shake ups in the industry are IOO as nothing compared to the one that is coming.

Validate validate validate - or be one of those who go under.


Carsten (With a "C" :)) Pedersen
Spokesgorilla
Copenhagen
Denmark
August 26th 2003

< Message edited by gorilla -- 8/26/2003 6:26:42 PM >


_____________________________

Mháircaish

Signature self-censored to protect the sensibilities of the thin-skinned :).

May we never confuse honest dissent with disloyal subversion. – Dwight D. Eisenhower



(in reply to Mike_R)
Page:   [1]

All Forums >> Web Development >> Microsoft FrontPage Help >> Can' t Understand Why Site Is So Different in Netscape!
Page: [1]
Jump to: 1





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts