|
Peppergal -> RE: Apply text style (2/18/2004 1:07:03)
|
quote:
I know I have much to still learn, but from what I have been reading with all of this, it pays to be compliant. That's why I want to make sure that everything validates. In the context of "site design" I have only used two tables on one page for that purpose (text/image) in the name of design. My other usage of tables is to provide information in a sensible, logical progression. The image is there for information purposes, not for looks. I'm not using the tables, in general, to manipulate layout for design purposes, but rather to present it in an easy to look at manner. My ultimate goal, therefore, is not so much to be "pure CSS" for its own sake but to provide the information to the user in an eye pleasing, w3c compliant, cross browser friendly manner. I use the CSS to position my general layout elements: navigation, placement of certain content on the page, etc...but for the actual information, I may resort to tables if it will help me present the information in a sensible manner. On the real estate site, the image is not really for design purposes but for information. It's not eye candy; it's part of what the person is lookng for; it's just another piece of data. Therefore, I feel, in my mind, that using tables in that manner is justified. It's just that the information is in the form of a jpg rather than text. I admit, that my usage of tables here, at the top of this page for the two pictures is wrong, according to CSS purist standards: http://www.lightexpressionscandles.com/lightexpill.htm I'm sure the table below, with all the styles and sizes, is an acceptable use of tables... But I feel that my other usage of tables on the other pages is acceptable, as well, for the time being. I simply do not have the time nor do I see a reason to use 9 different divs nested, when one CSS-styled table with 9 cells will accomplish the same thing and still validate my page according to W3C standards. My opinion is that if I were to use pure CSS, the page would look ridiculous in NN4, with the skills I currently possess, as the divs would all end up being underneath one another since NN4 doesn't recognize "float" and I would be unable to float the divs. I am working on a tight schedule here and don't have the time to experiment at this point in time. Using the tables will allow any NN4 users to view my site in a more sensible fashion....and like I said, since the pages are validated, I see nothing wrong with using CSS and tables together in this fashion. I'm sort of a semi conformist, I guess. Eclectic, if you please. I gladly replace deprecated tags such as <td width="33%"> with <td style="width: 33%;">. Since that works and validates, I see nothing wrong with using it at this point in time. Considering how far I've come from my first site, though, I'm sure I'll soon abandon tables all together - with very few exceptions - in the future, when I have more time to fool around with it and become more adept. LOL, I still cringe at some of the things on my first site built with Front Page. I 'll have to look and see if it's still on Geocities...they may have taken if off, as i haven't touched it in over a year and a half. LOL
|
|
|
|