|
| |
|
|
abdulsamikhan
Posts: 105
Joined: 12/23/2003
From: Pakistan
Status: offline
 |
Can you? (New Website) - 3/21/2004 11:17:22
Just uploaded...
http://www.khairulkaseer.org
(No Flash, No Counter: LoL)
Waiting for your reply
|
|
|
|
LoriL1212
Posts: 394
Joined: 1/30/2004
From: South Florida
Status: offline
|
RE: Can you? (New Website) - 3/21/2004 11:25:00
1. Logo and all top navigation graphics are pixelated. Need to optimized a bit higher to preserve clarity.
2. I don't like the empty grey bar between the nav and the content. If you want a separator for the nav and content, I would make it only 1px high (the same as the red center bar is wide)
3. The image on the left (at 1024x768 at least) does not fill the space (and fully fill the area that the buttons do). I would resize to match the width of the 3 buttons combined.
4. Loose the green bar at the bottom (where the copy/credit is) and choose a color from what you have within the site.
INSIDE
5. Make the logo area OR the buttons all the same width (where the red bar lines up with the left side of the HOME navigation box) .... OR better yet, loose the red bar.
< Message edited by LoriL1212 -- 3/21/2004 11:26:58 >
_____________________________
Lori Leach :: zenful creations :: kudos :: musings
| |
|
|
|
ellipisces
Posts: 849
Joined: 12/14/2003
Status: offline
|
RE: Can you? (New Website) - 3/21/2004 15:53:59
funny typo...home page and also saw it on "Achievements". Should be: lack, not lake.
quote:
due to lake of proper financial resources
wish I had a lake of proper financial resources....
Is your target audience mostly US or English speaking? Nonetheless, you might want to have the site proofread by a professional. Many of the sentences are extremely long and require a second pass. In contrast many of the bulleted lists are too consise, making them hard to understand as well.
I usually make the Home link on the home page inactive or just leave it off entirely, it just confuses the user because when you click nothing seems to happen...
< Message edited by ellipisces -- 3/21/2004 13:05:11 >
_____________________________
| |
|
|
|
Minix
Posts: 435
Joined: 2/13/2004
Status: offline
|
RE: Can you? (New Website) - 3/21/2004 21:03:40
This is a non-denominational, non- egalitarian, non-utilitarian, non-sequitered, non-monetarian critique. Hire somebody to work on the syntax and sentence structures.
| |
|
|
|
d a v e
Posts: 4142
Joined: 7/24/2002
From: England (but live in Finland now)
Status: offline
|
RE: Can you? (New Website) - 3/22/2004 4:27:37
what's wrong with PSP?!
they should be gifs, then they won't look soft and compressed
_____________________________
David Prescott
Gekko web design
| |
|
|
|
d a v e
Posts: 4142
Joined: 7/24/2002
From: England (but live in Finland now)
Status: offline
|
RE: Can you? (New Website) - 3/22/2004 5:04:19
or png's then...
_____________________________
David Prescott
Gekko web design
| |
|
|
|
abdulsamikhan
Posts: 105
Joined: 12/23/2003
From: Pakistan
Status: offline
|
RE: Can you? (New Website) - 3/22/2004 10:49:17
Thanks everybody who consider my website to Criticize:
First of I talk to LoriL1212 :
You are absolutely right. I will change all the design mistakes you have pointed and I agree with them. Thank you Lori
Dear ellipisces and Jaybee:
Thank you for studying the website deeply for the syntaxes and sentences as well as grammer. Actually, I am from Pakistan. I am working for my client. All the text has been provided by my client and when I asked him for the grammer mistakes, he said paste it as it is that he has checked and proof read all the text. So I am bound to paste as it is, according to my client's will. And I hope you can understand my situation.
Dear Giomanach:
I am happy that you like the non-counter website. If you ask me that "Do you like counters?" then my answer will "I don't like counters on any website, there are plenty of other tools to monitor the website's traffic". All the websites on which the counter is present is according the the demand of my client, and I couldn't do anything except to fit the counter.
Dear All,
I would fix all the graphics and give it some professional touch for the better look... You can give it a visit after a week.
Thanks once again to all my senior Professionals.
| |
|
|
|
BamseIsUnix
Posts: 108
Joined: 2/18/2004
Status: offline
|
RE: Can you? (New Website) - 3/24/2004 6:59:04
The site looks very impressive. Wow.
Only one problem I find. We've had this conversation before about using tables for layout, but in this case, losing ALL the tables and font tags on this site would shrink the code to 1/3. Use CSS. That would mean faster loading, saved bandwidth and compatibility with every browser you ever might imagine. And because of this, unfortunately, abdulsamikhan, I think this is one of those sites which are perfectly inaccessible for blind people with screen readers. Tables are not for layout. The language isn't called HTMSL or "HyperText Markup and Style Language".
But the site looks really cool. Nothing to complain about that.
I you can, maybe you should increase the font size a bit.
Regards,
Bamse
| |
|
|
|
d a v e
Posts: 4142
Joined: 7/24/2002
From: England (but live in Finland now)
Status: offline
|
RE: Can you? (New Website) - 3/24/2004 7:36:47
tables aren't inherently screen reader unfriendly - only if they don't make sense when linearised.
if you're going to comment every time that someone uses tables at least point them to some css positioning resources that they can use if they decide to take your advice and include some beginners sites in that list because obviously someone still using font tags isn't going to find css-p that easy.
_____________________________
David Prescott
Gekko web design
| |
|
|
|
LoriL1212
Posts: 394
Joined: 1/30/2004
From: South Florida
Status: offline
|
RE: Can you? (New Website) - 3/24/2004 9:09:25
I 100% agree.
Thank you Dave!
_____________________________
Lori Leach :: zenful creations :: kudos :: musings
| |
|
|
|
abdulsamikhan
Posts: 105
Joined: 12/23/2003
From: Pakistan
Status: offline
|
RE: Can you? (New Website) - 3/26/2004 8:21:35
In connection with all the above comments I wanna say something:
First check this website in different resolutions e.g. 800 x 600, and in higher resolutions the design should not disturb. I always attach CSS to the webpage and kept all the CSS in separate folder i.e. css/css.css. Once I configure the Sub Page then I make Save As approach for different links/subpages...
I think the Tables are the easiest to:
Layout the Design
Maintain the Site
Control the Contents etc...
I also agree with the above comments that (if the border is = 0) it doesn't effect on the design's look...
What do you people say more about this...?
| |
|
|
|
BamseIsUnix
Posts: 108
Joined: 2/18/2004
Status: offline
|
RE: Can you? (New Website) - 3/27/2004 3:21:32
quote:
I really think that you should use css rather than those ghastly front page rollovers for your rollover effects. You'll drastically cut loading time apart from anything else. The FP rollovers also have a nasty habit of browser crashing.
And as implemented on your site don't work in other browsers anyway.
"Rollovers"? Well that's maybe why I don't see any "rollovers". I'm on Mozilla Firefox.
But your site works for me and as I said, looks good for me.
Regards,
Bamse
| |
|
 New Messages |
 No New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
 Locked w/ New Messages |
 Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|
Printable Version 
