|
| |
|
|
Reflect
Posts: 4769
From: USA
Status: offline
 |
RE: More Domains for Better Search Results? - 10/14/2004 8:36:41
Right, no worries.
Take care,
Brian
_____________________________
|
|
|
|
Anthony Parsons
Posts: 16
Joined: 9/26/2004
Status: offline
|
RE: More Domains for Better Search Results? - 10/14/2004 8:54:52
You can't think of this like.....am I convinced or not, cause it just doesn't work that way. You WILL find plenty of domains, folders and filenames with three or more hypens within the SE indexes....not doubting that. What I am saying, and plenty of others, is that the search engines themselves have made this public, and are now targeting it. For example, sites in Yahoo and Google that have 10,000, 20, 30,000 + are all losing pages within the SE indexes. Why? Because the pages they are using are hypen rich keyword names spat out of a CMS. The entire site has not been removed, just most of their content. So, what about a 5 or 10 page site? Well, at present the algorithms haven't changed to automatically filter these smaller variable sites out, though it is immenent that the algorithms will incorporate a hypen filter as the search engine technologists have clearly stated it WILL be incorporated within futrue updates. Florida update has nothing to do with hypens. Florida update seriously kicked in semantics and anchor text, thats about all. Google only makes up 28% of search queries now, not 50%, so I would get out of that Google only frame of mind and focus on pleasing all three main engines. Whilst Google and Yahoo are now knowns for certain features and features that will be included within future algo updates, MSN is still a new kid on the block again with their new algo in beta to be released mid next year if all goes well. MSN are testing their block rank algo, which is completely different again. So you may as well start getting it right now while you have the time up your sleeve instead of leaving it till your site drops out and you lose business, ie. like most did in florida. They give us the warning, but people choose to ignore it.
| |
|
|
|
dpf
Posts: 7126
Joined: 11/12/2003
From: India-napolis
Status: offline
|
RE: More Domains for Better Search Results? - 10/14/2004 9:01:09
quote:
so I would get out of that Google only frame of mind
excellent point. many of us have fallen into that trap recently.
_____________________________
Dan
| |
|
|
|
Reflect
Posts: 4769
From: USA
Status: offline
|
RE: More Domains for Better Search Results? - 10/14/2004 14:44:51
I guess I should clarify a statement I made prior in this post. You, AP, keep talking about 3+ keywords in the page name kicked out via cms. I am only talking two. I would like to believe that the two syntaxes would be treated differently with the algo. One being obvious spam the other being a natural naming convention.
quote:
so I would get out of that Google only frame of mind and focus on pleasing all three main engines.
I never mentioned only Google, you assumed there (Only mention I made was a query drop as an example).
Thoughts???
Not trying to antagonize here AP.
Take care,
Brian
_____________________________
| |
|
 New Messages |
 No New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
 Locked w/ New Messages |
 Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|
Printable Version 
