navigation
a webmaster learning community
     Home    Register     Search      Help      Login    
Sponsors

Shopping Cart Software
Ecommerce software integrated into Frontpage, Dreamweaver and Golive templates. No monthly fees and available in ASP and PHP versions.

Website Templates
We also have a wide selection of Dreamweaver, Expression Web and Frontpage templates as well as webmaster tools and CSS layouts.

Frontpage website templates
Creative Website Templates for FrontPage, Dreamweaver, Flash, SwishMax

Search Forums
 

Advanced search
Recent Posts

 Todays Posts
 Most Active posts
 Posts since last visit
 My Recent Posts
 Mark posts read

Microsoft MVP

 

Frame Hater Beware

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
Printable Version 

All Forums >> Web Design >> Web Graphics >> Frame Hater Beware
Page: [1]
 
Bnugent

 

Posts: 257
From: Tampa Florida Tampa, FL USA
Status: offline

 
Frame Hater Beware - 2/12/2001 20:41:00   
I have designed a site (at the request of the owners) in frames.

http://www.msccamp.com

I know, I know, I couldnt talk them out of it. I am having a problem getting the graphics to line up correctly. Some I have used a backgrounds, and other as gifs. Any help or suggestions so that I can have the frames aligned and looking smoothly in both IE and NN would be appreciated. Thanks

------------------
Brian---

[This message has been edited by Bnugent (edited 02-12-2001).]

sandtiger

 

Posts: 36
From: little rock, ar, usa
Status: offline

 
RE: Frame Hater Beware - 2/12/2001 20:34:00   
what would be the difference in doing the page in frames.. and not... are frames bad????

(in reply to Bnugent)
Goober

 

Posts: 1156
From: Pennsylvania USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Frame Hater Beware - 2/12/2001 14:37:00   
Sandtiger, you can look at this page to see why frames can be bad: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9612.html

Brian, you can try going into you body tags and setting all your margins to zero. <body topmargin="0" leftmargin="0" rightmargin="0" bottommargin="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">

Sandy

------------------
www.alleghenyweb.com


(in reply to Bnugent)
Bnugent

 

Posts: 257
From: Tampa Florida Tampa, FL USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Frame Hater Beware - 2/12/2001 16:11:00   
I tried your suggestion although I am not sure that it appears to be working. How does this page look on your monitors. Are there uneven breaks in the design. I do not want to go forward with navigational buttons until I am sure that I have everything else straightned up. Am I wrong in using these images as background picks. I have the whole image saved as an EPS file and I cut it up and saved as gif

------------------
Brian---


(in reply to Bnugent)
sandtiger

 

Posts: 36
From: little rock, ar, usa
Status: offline

 
RE: Frame Hater Beware - 2/12/2001 16:26:00   
looks off.. im using 19" inch with 800 X 600 res.


(in reply to Bnugent)
Goober

 

Posts: 1156
From: Pennsylvania USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Frame Hater Beware - 2/12/2001 18:47:00   
You must have been working on this as I was looking at it.

It looks ok in IE but you have to include marginheight="0" and marginwidth="0" for Netscape. Also, you're missing the closing html tag, </html>, so in Netscape your content is not showing.

Sandy

------------------
www.alleghenyweb.com


(in reply to Bnugent)
Bnugent

 

Posts: 257
From: Tampa Florida Tampa, FL USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Frame Hater Beware - 2/12/2001 18:51:00   
The weird thing is that it looks ok in ie if you have your settings at 800x600 and if you have your address, and standards buttons showing. But if you dont have these standard buttons showing and you press F11, you will see what I mean about the background images not matching up. I would like to make sure that no matter what browser, and what settings, and what buttons are displayed above the adress bar in IE it looks standardized. I can not seem to accomplish this. Any suggestions. I am starting to think that I am not cutting the image up correctly.

------------------
Brian---


(in reply to Bnugent)
Bnugent

 

Posts: 257
From: Tampa Florida Tampa, FL USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Frame Hater Beware - 2/13/2001 20:30:00   
Has everyone given up on me already?

------------------
Brian---


(in reply to Bnugent)
LB

 

Posts: 5551
From: Montana USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Frame Hater Beware - 2/13/2001 20:53:00   
Hi, Brian -

I wish I could help you, but I'm not experienced with frames. The page also is off a bit if the window size is reduced, so most likely also has a problem in low resolutions. Have you also checked it in a higher resolution?

I see you have "noresize" on your frame, so I have no clues from there. I'm sure someone else will be along to help.

Don't forget to put some "real" information in the noframes tags instead of "This page uses frames, but your browser doesn't support them."

Linda

------------------
Ruby Marketing

New Web Template: A Valentine Invitation - not just for Valentine's Day!


(in reply to Bnugent)
Gene

 

Posts: 2266
From: Cleburne Texas USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Frame Hater Beware - 2/13/2001 23:46:00   
I use NN exclusively so I cannot help until you fix your html tag.

------------------
Life Is Grand!

Gene White
WebTeky Full Service Web Development
http://www.webteky.com/
http://www.webteky.net


(in reply to Bnugent)
Nancy

 

Posts: 3626
Joined: 11/9/1999
From: Nebraska
Status: offline

 
RE: Frame Hater Beware - 2/14/2001 20:16:00   
I'm with Linda on this one - I have very little experience in working with frames. But it does seem to me that getting the graphics to all line up with frames would be extremely difficult, when you take into account all the monitor sizes and resolutions people use, plus the different browsers. At least with tables you can allow for some of those things.

Are you sure you can't convice your client to not use frames? What is the client wanting to accomplish that they feel frames is the way to go? Okay, okay I am not really asking, so you don't have to answer. Mostly I was just 'thinking out loud'.

I'm sorry I can't help more. I did one frame site, that lasted about a week before I realized it just wasn't going to work for me.

Nancy

------------------
Modern Fairy Tale: "And so the prince, determined to find the owner of the glass slipper,launched a home page on the World Wide Web."
Mall of Alliance


(in reply to Bnugent)
LB

 

Posts: 5551
From: Montana USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Frame Hater Beware - 2/14/2001 20:24:00   
Shirley - Help!

Brian, btw - nice job with the graphics.

Linda

------------------
Ruby Marketing

New Web Template: A Valentine Invitation - not just for Valentine's Day!


(in reply to Bnugent)
Shirley

 

Posts: 3126
Joined: 1/8/1999
From: Omaha, Ne USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Frame Hater Beware - 2/14/2001 20:33:00   
It is off in IE 5 at 800x600 with or without the tool bars.

It is waaaaay off in IE5 at 1024x768.

Have you checked your math?? Do your tables/cells/frames/images all add up correctly?? The image in the top frame is tiling for some reason and throwing everything off.


(in reply to Bnugent)
Shirley

 

Posts: 3126
Joined: 1/8/1999
From: Omaha, Ne USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Frame Hater Beware - 2/14/2001 20:02:00   
I just went and checked one I did a long time ago. I put a table in the top frame and put the background graphic in the table not the page. Maybe that will keep the top frame from tiling.

------------------
Shirley

There must be some kinda way out of here
said the joker to the thief.

Money Tree Systems


(in reply to Bnugent)
Bnugent

 

Posts: 257
From: Tampa Florida Tampa, FL USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Frame Hater Beware - 2/14/2001 20:18:00   
Wow. Thanks for the abundance of responses. I have made some changes so look again and tell me what you think. Thanks

http://www.msccamp.com

------------------
Brian---


(in reply to Bnugent)
Nancy

 

Posts: 3626
Joined: 11/9/1999
From: Nebraska
Status: offline

 
RE: Frame Hater Beware - 2/14/2001 20:36:00   
I do like it better without the graphic in the bottom of the main section. However the top frame needs maybe some slight adjustment for 800x600. The text links are cut off, so that only about 3/4 of the text appears to me. I can read them enough they could be used, but they are not quite as they should be.

If I use the F11 key in IE to toggle to full screen, then I see all the text on those links.

Nancy

------------------
Modern Fairy Tale: "And so the prince, determined to find the owner of the glass slipper,launched a home page on the World Wide Web."
Mall of Alliance


(in reply to Bnugent)
Bnugent

 

Posts: 257
From: Tampa Florida Tampa, FL USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Frame Hater Beware - 2/14/2001 23:01:00   
Thanks Nancy. Buttons are defin. on my list still. Until I create them I will need quickly added some using the text tool in FP2K. I will eventually create buttons for navigation that have alt text, and rollovers. I think I have it up and running so that it looks ok in different screen area pixel sizes and also in NN but I need others out there to confirm.

------------------
Brian---


(in reply to Bnugent)
LB

 

Posts: 5551
From: Montana USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Frame Hater Beware - 2/14/2001 23:33:00   
The buttons are missing if the window is minimized ...probably in 640x480 resolution, also.

Linda

------------------
Ruby Marketing

New Web Template: A Valentine Invitation - not just for Valentine's Day!


(in reply to Bnugent)
Page:   [1]

All Forums >> Web Design >> Web Graphics >> Frame Hater Beware
Page: [1]
Jump to: 1





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts