(Hopefully) a quick question

	Home Register Search Help Login

Sponsors

Shopping Cart Software
Ecommerce software integrated into Frontpage, Dreamweaver and Golive templates. No monthly fees and available in ASP and PHP versions.

Website Templates
We also have a wide selection of Dreamweaver, Expression Web and Frontpage templates as well as webmaster tools and CSS layouts.

Frontpage website templates
Creative Website Templates for FrontPage, Dreamweaver, Flash, SwishMax

Search Forums

Recent Posts

Todays Posts
Most Active posts
Posts since last visit
My Recent Posts
Mark posts read

(Hopefully) a quick question

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> Web Development >> ASP and Database >> (Hopefully) a quick question

Page: [1]


yogaboy Posts: 377 Joined: 5/22/2004 Status: offline	(Hopefully) a quick question - 11/15/2004 14:06:55 Does it take more resources for the server to write a whole web page using Response.writes or is it better to write most of the html and then just slip in a few <% Response.write myRecordis("blah") %> here and there? Anyone know the answer?


dpf Posts: 7121 Joined: 11/12/2003 From: India-napolis Status: offline	RE: (Hopefully) a quick question - 11/15/2004 15:10:52 when the server gets the request for the asp file, it executes the asp code ...including, of course, response.write - so if the whole html page has to be written from the asp, that surely takes more resources than if the server only had to execute smaller amount of asp and then send the html. the server sends 100% html..the question is simply does it write some or all. obviously takes more to write it all _____________________________ Dan (in reply to yogaboy)


aaronwiles Posts: 200 Joined: 7/5/2004 From: Aaron Wiles Status: offline	RE: (Hopefully) a quick question - 11/15/2004 20:30:38 This is one of those debates that no one actually knows the answer to. When executing a page with both html and asp code in the web page, the web server is switching from the ASP engine to the err well lets call it the HTML engine, you could say this actually uses more resources as the server is switching from back and fourth and not just using the one resource. I personally do it this way on the most part (HTML+ASP Mixed) but that is because I find it much easier to troubleshoot and change things, although you will find that most complicated open source ASP coded programs just use ASP and not a mixture of both as the switching between engines takes a little longer to process the page. So the question is, what you yourself think is quicker...! < Message edited by aaronwiles -- 11/16/2004 8:29:45 > _____________________________ You really never learn to swear until you get a computer. (in reply to dpf)


Spooky Posts: 26599 Joined: 11/11/1998 From: Middle Earth Status: offline	RE: (Hopefully) a quick question - 11/15/2004 21:42:09 It used to be that inline asp was slower, however, since IIS5 the opposite is true. The actual time is negligible though. Just code in a way that is easy for you and those following to understand. _____________________________ If you arent part of the solution, then there is good money to be made prolonging the problem ��k� Database / DRW help Check out the Tutorials for Frontpage Databases Forum FAQ' s Developers Edition Spooky Login User Registration and Management tool Personalized Frontpage Hosting (in reply to aaronwiles)


yogaboy Posts: 377 Joined: 5/22/2004 Status: offline	RE: (Hopefully) a quick question - 11/17/2004 5:09:09 Phew! I thought I was killing the server by mixing my asp and html. It must've been that jam doughnut that I dropped in it making it run so slow... Thanks people, much appreciated as always. (in reply to Spooky)