|
| |
|
|
RickP
Posts: 715 Joined: 11/13/2004 From: Kent, U.K. Status: offline
|
INCLUDES and search engines? - 5/23/2005 17:23:23
I am just wondering about the effect that 'includes' (of all persuasions) have on search engine indexing... E.g. - If I use a page include for all of my navigation will the S.E. robots find it and follow the site links from it? E.g 2 - If I create a page with a site banner but also add some keywords in the section and subsequently 'include' it on all site pages will the keywords be read by the SE robots and included in the keyword density of the rest of the page that 'includes' it? Just two example questions but you see where I am going - can anyone answer this question? Thanks
_____________________________
Regards, Rick On-The-Web-Now!
|
|
|
|
RickP
Posts: 715 Joined: 11/13/2004 From: Kent, U.K. Status: offline
|
RE: INCLUDES and search engines? - 5/23/2005 18:41:19
Right... in other words... if my 'include' page was the only page to have site navigation on it then the SE robots wouldn't get past my home page - is that what you are saying?
_____________________________
Regards, Rick On-The-Web-Now!
|
|
|
|
Mojo
Posts: 2472 From: Chicago Status: offline
|
RE: INCLUDES and search engines? - 5/23/2005 21:53:56
No. He said - quote:
If you view the source of the page, then that is the view the search engine sees. If you can see it, the SE's can see it. Your include navigation page would display on every page - so you're safe. I typically have multiple includes: inc_header inc_top_nav inc_left_nav inc_rightside_box inc_footer inc_bottom_nav
_____________________________
Split Testing GPS Vehicle Tracking Chicago Marketing
|
|
|
|
RickP
Posts: 715 Joined: 11/13/2004 From: Kent, U.K. Status: offline
|
RE: INCLUDES and search engines? - 5/24/2005 6:35:43
Ah, gotcha'all - I see it all adds up on the returned page from the server and as long as that is what the SE robots see then that's good! I have read the short tutorial on this site on includes - does anyone else have anything to add? - some 'must do' advice! It would seem that FP includes are the easiest way if the server has extensions - would you agree? I am wondering about ssi includes requiring .shtml extensions and working with these pages in FrontPage - If I rename all my pages ".shtml" will FP still handle all of these pages in the same way as it does standard html pages?
_____________________________
Regards, Rick On-The-Web-Now!
|
|
|
|
RickP
Posts: 715 Joined: 11/13/2004 From: Kent, U.K. Status: offline
|
RE: INCLUDES and search engines? - 5/24/2005 8:44:19
And another one on includes please... Re page layout... Let's say my main page has a 6oopx width table layout. Now, I want to 'include' a page banner across the top and a nav bar down one side. On the banner page to BE inluded, do I need to put my banner inside a 600px table cell in order to ensure it's going to fit okay? Let's say my banner fades to green and I want the remainder of the bgnd to match the green - do I put this green bgnd with the banner image on the page to BE included or do I set the top table cell on my main page to a green bgnd and then 'include' the other page into it? Maybe I just 'inlude' my banner as a stand-alone image rather than as part of a page - do I? With the vertical nav bar... again how do I ensure it fits the main page seemlessly? What is the best way to make all elements fit together etc?
_____________________________
Regards, Rick On-The-Web-Now!
|
|
|
|
Reflect
Posts: 4765 From: USA Status: offline
|
RE: INCLUDES and search engines? - 5/24/2005 8:55:49
quote:
does anyone else have anything to add? A common mistake people make when creating includes is they make the include page have all the base elements. Think of an include page as it is inserted into the page that calls it so you can "drop" a lot of elements. Example of a base HTML page with nothing on it: <html> <head> </head> <body> </body> </html> Now a lot of people also put the above in their include pages. It is not needed. All you need is: <body> </body> nothing more. Of course you will need to insert whatever your include is of course. I do something different though I make a directory off of the root of my web called includes. This is where all my include pages go. I then disallow spidering of the include directory via robots.txt. This will prevent your lone include pages from showing up in the SEs. It will however not prevent the page that has the includes in it from being spidered and the content of the include page gets spidered via the bot reading the content page which has the include page rendered in it. Take care, Brian
_____________________________
|
|
|
|
RickP
Posts: 715 Joined: 11/13/2004 From: Kent, U.K. Status: offline
|
RE: INCLUDES and search engines? - 5/24/2005 9:06:07
Yes, thanks Brian - and good advice re the robots file disallowing the include content on its own - good point. But I was also thinking about page layout - but I guess the best thing is just to start playing with this - thanks again for your point. Are FP includes the best way to go? or ssi, php... ???
_____________________________
Regards, Rick On-The-Web-Now!
|
|
|
|
RickP
Posts: 715 Joined: 11/13/2004 From: Kent, U.K. Status: offline
|
RE: INCLUDES and search engines? - 5/24/2005 10:01:07
Jaybee, Would you say that PHP includes have any great advantage over FP includes?
_____________________________
Regards, Rick On-The-Web-Now!
|
|
|
|
RickP
Posts: 715 Joined: 11/13/2004 From: Kent, U.K. Status: offline
|
RE: INCLUDES and search engines? - 5/24/2005 15:39:58
Thanks for that - as I say, I did find it (inside the public_html directory) - with a clunky file mgr in my control panel - possibly the same as yours - certainly similar. It can be edited directly in the file mgr without the need for Notepad Perhaps now I will try the php method of inclusions along with the code you've supplied - however, if it requires a separate .htaccess file in every directory then once again that takes away a few benefits of convenience unfortunately - but maybe it will work with just one htaccess file - in the root (?) I knew that this file could be used for passwords and I was also interested in its use for control of caching - for pages where I don't want browser caching to occur - apparently it is a better method than using metatags. Well, now I've found it I shall have to research its uses again many thanks
_____________________________
Regards, Rick On-The-Web-Now!
|
|
|
|
Nicole
Posts: 2959 Joined: 9/15/2004 From: Sydney, Australia Status: offline
|
RE: INCLUDES and search engines? - 5/25/2005 4:47:48
Hi Rick, I'm using includes with a banner image on my website with a fixed width at www.nixdesign.com.au I think an important thing to consider when working with fixed widths is to take into account the size of any padding, cell spacing and borders. Nicole
_____________________________
". . . and God created man in his image." errr, shouldn't that be "and man created God in his image'?
|
|
|
|
RickP
Posts: 715 Joined: 11/13/2004 From: Kent, U.K. Status: offline
|
RE: INCLUDES and search engines? - 5/25/2005 6:23:45
Thanks Nicole - of OZ! Let me get this right... 1. This is a FrontPage include? 2. Looking at your final page and the included page (located from your source) you have designed your main page using tables and have also designed the page (part-page - to be included) as a table too - hence the final result is a nested table - correct? This is what I was thinking to try first of all but was wondering if that is the best approach. Thanks for showing me this. BTW... 3... Yours is the second site I have seen by designers on this forum where your meta keywords have a space after each comma, I always thought that they shouldn't contain spaces - is this not right, or maybe just something not relevant nowadays?
_____________________________
Regards, Rick On-The-Web-Now!
|
|
|
|
Nicole
Posts: 2959 Joined: 9/15/2004 From: Sydney, Australia Status: offline
|
RE: INCLUDES and search engines? - 5/25/2005 7:48:19
Hi Rick, 1. Yes these are FrontPage Includes. 2. Yes it equates to nested tables, but I also have another example where the include didn't use a containing table but it still resizes to fit the available area set aside for the include. www.gendercentre.org.au www.gendercentre.org.au/left.htm (left include) 3. As Kitka says, i just always put a space after a comma. Nicole
_____________________________
". . . and God created man in his image." errr, shouldn't that be "and man created God in his image'?
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|