Do you need to comply? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Web Development] >> Accessibility



Message


jaybee -> Do you need to comply? (8/5/2005 7:01:52)

PLEASE DO NOT POST COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS IN THIS TOPIC.
If you notice that something in this topic is wrong, or you have a query, please start a new topic or PM the original author, providing full details so that the information can be checked.


Current Legislation - August 2006
updated January 2007

The following posts contain precis of legislation within different countries with regard to accessibility and websites. This is obviously subject to change and you should consult the appropriate country guidelines listed at WEBAIM for the latest information.


NB.
Not all websites are required by law to be compliant with Accessibility rules. Check in the Country posts below. If you're still not sure then we recommend you check the lists at WEBAIM or contact your local Government office. Another useful link is on the SAP Web Site. This was last updated August 2005.

For web sites that should comply: If a customer contacts you about an access issue with your website you should try to resolve the dispute by informal or formal discussion. If the dispute cannot be resolved, it could then be taken to court.


Plain English version of the prosecution of the Sydney Olympics Committee

The standard for accessibility differs according to each country but where there are rules, they all agree on a minimum of WCAG priority 1. A checklist is available HERE

Members from other countries are invited to post their regs on this thread. Please try to stick to the format of the initial posts to make it easier for visitors to find the information they require.





jaybee -> RE: Do you need to comply? (8/5/2005 7:08:11)

United Kingdom

Legislation - Disability Discrimination Act

The Disability Rights Commission state:

"All organisations that provide goods, facilities or services to the public, whether paid for or for free, are covered by the Disability Discrimination Act, no matter how large or small they are."

To be safe, you should aim to ensure your website meets at least Priority 2 of the World Wide Web Consortium Web Content Accessibility Guidelines.




jaybee -> RE: Do you need to comply? (8/5/2005 7:14:57)

United States of America

This one is complicated.

All Federal web sites are required to comply with Section 508 - you can validate your site here.
Companies that work for/with Federal agencies are required to make sure that the relevant part/s of their sites also comply with Section 508

In addition there is the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) which covers other sites.

Currently 22 states have IT accessibility laws and 5 states are presently in the preliminary stages of drafting legislation, issuing executive orders, or writing policies.

Update Apr 2007

State of Illinois Web Accessibility Standards
State of Texas Web Accessibility & Usability

List of cases and rulings

Listed below are Americans with disabilities suing US companies however, possibly more important is to monitor the outcome of this appeal where a UK citizen has successfully sued a US company under the UK Disability Discrimination Act.

Judge Rules That Inaccessible Website Violates ADA
Application of ADA to the Internet: US Department of Justice Ruling
National Federation of the Blind vs. AOL
Applicability of the ADA to Private Internet Sites
Robert Gumson vs. Southwest Airlines and Access Now vs. Southwest Airlines
Spitzer Agreement
Amazon.com and NFB join forces
Oracle sued by blind workers in Texas
Target Lawsuit

Update Jan 2007

quote:

Americans with Disabilities Act

Even if you are not interested in selling electronic and information technology to the US government, accessibility law as it relates to information technology could still affect you.

More and more, the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) are having an impact on web developers and software publishers. Signed into law in 1990 by President George H.W. Bush, the ADA "prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in employment, programs and services provided by state and local governments, goods and services provided by private companies, and in commercial facilities."

Increasingly the ADA, which is enforced by the United States Justice Department, is being successfully applied to websites. In an opinion letter issued in September 1996, the Justice Department determined that "Covered entities under the ADA are required to provide effective communication, regardless of whether they generally communicate through print media, audio media, or computerized media such as the Internet. Covered entities that use the Internet for communications regarding their programs, goods, or services must be prepared to offer those communications through accessible means as well."

Applying the ADA to websites opens the door for assessing websites and technology companies with high-profile civil penalties. Indeed, some high-profile cases have recently brought that point home.

In August 2004, Cendant Corporation, owner of Ramada.com and Priceline.com, settled a lawsuit brought by the state of New York and Attorney General Elliot Spitzer. In the settlement, Cendant agreed to make Ramada.com and Priceline.com easier to use for the blind and visually impaired. In addition, Cendant will pay New York state $77,500 for the cost of the state's investigation.

The law is being applied to all manner of disabilities and technologies. In September 2005, the National Association of the Deaf (NAD) and the law firm of Outten & Golden filed a class-action discrimination complaint in Connecticut after Morgan Stanley refused to accept a stock trade order from a deaf account holder, Donald A. Bruner, Jr., who called using a telecommunications relay service.

In February 2006, a blind UC Berkeley student filed a class-action lawsuit against the website hosted by Target Corporation, the Minnesota-based retailer. The suit alleges violations of the ADA, stating, "Target thus excludes the blind from full and equal participation in the growing Internet economy that is increasingly a fundamental part of daily life." Joining in the suit is the National Federation of the Blind.


Extract from
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/logged_in/gpisocky_accessibility.html




jaybee -> RE: Do you need to comply? (8/5/2005 7:18:39)

The European Union

Currently, EU law requires all member states' public websites conform to at least Priority 2 of the W3C/WCAG. The guidelines state that all sites will be checked for compliance and must be completed by December 31st 2005. Public web site in this instance means Official Government sites. There is no current legislation under EU law for private web sites.

Individual countries with in the EU may have additional requirements. If the country is not listed in a post below, please check the lists at WEBAIM or contact your local Government Office.




jaybee -> RE: Do you need to comply? (8/6/2005 8:26:18)

IRELAND

Currently, Ireland conforms to the EU standards but The National Disability Authority (NDA) have now published national guidelines on accessibility of IT products and services. In the specific case of web accessibility, they have essentially adopted W3C WCAG 1.0 without substantive change. These guidelines however are not binding and are not explicitly referred to in any current legislation.

It's possible that existing laws on Employment Equality and Equal Status Rights could be interpreted to involve requirements for web accessibility in various situations, but, I have found no case law dealing with this. Complaints under these acts are dealt with by the Equality Tribunal.

Footnote:
Whilst searching for this information I went to the web site of the NDA and was highly amused to find that their Search facility only works in Internet Explorer! [&:]




jaybee -> RE: Do you need to comply? (8/7/2005 6:10:49)

Canada

At the present time this comes under the Canadian Human Rights Act which states -
quote:

The Canadian Human Rights Act recognizes that persons with disabilities must have
access to premises, services and facilities.

there is however no specific mention of web sites.

The Federal Common Look and Feel Standards require WCAG AA (Priority 2) compliance for all federal government websites.

However, the Ontario government is also currently proposing a new Act that would extend the obligation to provide accessible services and facilities to the private sector





jaybee -> RE: Do you need to comply? (8/20/2005 9:42:41)

Australia and New Zealand

Legislation - Disability Discrimination Act

The Human Resource & Equal Opportunity Commission state in part in the document “Disability Discrimination Advisory Notes Version 3.2, 2002” at point 2.2:

quote:

"The provision of information and online services through the Worldwide Web is a service covered by the DDA. Equal access for people with a disability in this area is required by the DDA where it can reasonably be provided.

This requirement applies to any individual or organisation developing a Worldwide Web page in Australia, or placing or maintaining a Web page on an Australian server. This includes pages developed or maintained for purposes relating to employment; education; provision of services including professional services, banking, insurance or financial services, entertainment or recreation, telecommunications services, public transport services, or government services; sale or rental of real estate; sport; activities of voluntary associations; or administration of Commonwealth laws or programs. All these are areas specifically covered by the DDA.

In addition to these specific areas, provision of any other information or other goods, services or facilities through the Internet is in itself a service, and as such, discrimination in the provision of this service is covered by the DDA. The DDA applies to services whether provided for payment or not.”


Australian Links:

Vision Australia
http://www.visionaustralia.org.au/info.aspx?page=639

Australian Government Information Management Office http://www.agimo.gov.au/practice/mws/accessibility

Human Rights & Equal Opportunity Commission http://www.humanrights.gov.au/disability_rights/standards/www_3/www_3.html#s2_2

Contributed by member Nicole

New Zealand link

E-Government Web Guidelines
http://www.e.govt.nz/standards/web-guidelines/




Tailslide -> RE: Do you need to comply? (1/19/2007 11:04:56)

Netherlands

On 1st September 2006 the Dutch Government brought in a new website accessibility law which includes the following:

quote:


every website built for a government agency is required by law to use
* valid HTML 4.01 or XHTML 1.0
* CSS and semantic HTML and separation of structure and presentation
* progressive enhancement
* the W3C DOM (instead of the old Microsoft document.all)
* meaningful values of class and id
* meaningful alt attributes on all images

Furthermore:

* scripts that work on links should extend the basic link functionality (think accessible popups)
* if a link makes no sense without a script, it shouldn't be in the HTML (but be generated by JavaScript)
* use of forms or scripts as the only means of getting certain information is prohibited
* removing the focus rectangle on links is prohibited
* information offered in a closed format (think Word) should also be offered in an open format
* the semantics of many HTML elements are explicitly defined






jaybee -> RE: Do you need to comply? (2/2/2007 9:19:58)

Germany

Very similar to the Dutch regulations above but active from 2002.




jaybee -> Do you need to comply? Illinois (4/9/2007 5:29:46)

See update to US standards specifically for developers in Illinois




jaybee -> RE: Do you need to comply? Illinois (4/10/2007 7:15:32)

See update to US standards specifically for developers in Texas plus details of completed and current accessibility lawsuits in the US.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.1099854