|
BobbyDouglas -> RE: DNS 1/2 Changed (8/24/2005 14:26:22)
|
quote:
Excuse me Mr Bobby Douglas, but this is turning into an unnecessary argument. - Just trying to understand where you are coming from, if you don't want to take the time to prove your points, just say so and I will let it be. quote:
What you need to realise is, I am talking about the DNS Servers, and you are talking about the local machine. Yes, they may be linked, but in this case, what we are talking about is two totally different matters. - The flushdns command is only for the local machine. (I never said it afffects the DNS servers) But that doesn't mean it won't help with propagation. If the DNS servers update, and your computer still has the previous ones cached or a failed attempt cached, then you will still go to the wrong dns. They might be two different matters, but there are similar in the sense that the local cached DNS affects where you go, and even if the DNS server updates, and your local dns is cached, you still have a great chance of going to the wrong place. quote:
Brians original question was about the two domains not changing at the same time, his second post states that all he needed was some patience, and it now works. The 8 hours gap is the propagation period needed for ALL DNS servers to refresh & update records - [Read above] there is still a chance that the DNS has been cached & thus can take longer if you don't use that command. quote:
This will always be the case regardless of whether you have cleared the local cache or not. The changes & updates in DNS records can take seconds, they can take days, it depends on where you are, and where the server is in the world. Therefore, patience is required. - Where have I argued that patience is not required? I am just saying that by clearing the DNS cache, there is a greater chance that you will be able to see the DNS changes quicker. I have provided a link that explain this to backup my points. quote:
And for the record, I keep no DNS cache on my machine, I keep no browser history and no browser cache, and I still receive the problems that Brian posted about above. So its not my cache that gives the waiting time, it's the propagation period. - Of course there is a propagation period, but once again, if you still have the previous DNS cached, it will affect how long it takes for you to see the new DNS. Why are you talking about browser history/cache? quote:
Please read my posts more carefully, and in their entirety for full understanding, and the actual meaning of what I am saying. - What did I not read? You just keep repeating the same thing about patience, but nowhere have I argued that you don't need patience. In fact you said it again right here: quote:
But it's not the LOCAL machine that needs altering, or anything doing to, you need the strange virtue known as patience. ....yet the link I posted earlier says otherwise. You can keep on saying "you need patience" but if you are not going to explain how my logic is wrong, your arguments will continue to have no strength.
|
|
|
|