RE: articles and seo

RE: articles and seo (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Web Development] >> Search Engine Optimization and Web Business

Message

BobbyDouglas -> RE: articles and seo (5/11/2006 14:20:17)
Let's try to stay on topic here. If you want to talk about the broken search engines, start a new thread.

Taz -> RE: articles and seo (5/11/2006 15:15:37)
Donkey said more than enough for me. /exits thread stage right before someone throws their dummy out'a the forum again

womble -> RE: articles and seo (5/11/2006 15:21:49)
/follows

Mojo -> RE: articles and seo (5/11/2006 15:24:31)
Bobby, your right of course, we should stay on topic, but IMO it's so far gone... Donkey, can you show me some examples of what you're talking about? I can't remember the last time Google returned something completely different than what I searched for. Examples would be appreciated. I do come across directories and lists, but they almost always have something in common with the searched for topic. quote: The SEO "industry" has perverted this useful tool to make money from people aimlessly clicking through to sites that have no interest to them then clicking out again. Google is not YOUR tool. It's a for-profit business. They determine which sites to index and where they rank in that index. Nobody else determines that. This is fact. There is no need to place quotes around the SEO Industry. It is huge business even if you were unaware. quote: but the advertisers who pay per click are also being cheated. What are you talking about?? Advertisers don't pay per click for the organic results... sheesh. quote: I know that a lot of people are making a lot of money out of SEO but their moral position is indefensible. Nice highhorse you're riding. If you had a clue I would think your opinion may be worth something. But your arguments don't make sense. quote: You may be able to make a lot of money with it but that is no defense, you can also make a lot of money from fraud and armed robbery. Example please. I wan't to see this rampat cheating that's going on. It sounds to me like sour grapes. Just because you can't compete - you blame everyone better than you. Nice.

Donkey -> RE: articles and seo (5/11/2006 19:02:29)
Firstly I am surprised that my post was considered to be off topic considering my comments followed on from yours. quote: Examples would be appreciated. You may have to wait for specific examples I'll see what I can find that illustrates the point. One of the most frustrating examples of this sort of thing is the shopping comparison sites IMHO these are an unnecessary intervention in the process of online shopping. quote: Google is not YOUR tool. It's a for-profit business. I'm afraid I must disagree with you on that one. Google's profitable business only exists because people like me use it regularly. It is my tool and if I and several million others stopped using it overnight they wouldn't have a business. quote: quote: but the advertisers who pay per click are also being cheated. What are you talking about?? Advertisers don't pay per click for the organic results... sheesh. OK so I don't know as much as you do about the mechanics of this process. I think the point I was making is still valid. i.e. if I have a site with pss poor content that is funded by advertising and all of my visitors are arriving because of my high ranking caused solely by backlinks (and then leaving straight away) I am cheating my advertisers. quote:* Nice highhorse you're riding. If you had a clue I would think your opinion may be worth something. But your arguments don't make sense. How come anyone who disagrees with you is some sort of idiot? I would hope that what is after all a genuine disagreement could be discussed in a more gentlemanly way. quote: Example please. I wan't to see this rampat cheating that's going on. You clearly don't understand the point, I am saying that all SEO is wrong because it is making the search engines come up with results that are vastly different from what they would be without SEO. For example without SEO sites would be ranked purely on their content which would give a fairer ranking system. I accept that this is an impossible dream now but don't you think it would be better (for the end user that is). quote: It sounds to me like sour grapes. Just because you can't compete - you blame everyone better than you. Nice. You are starting to imagine things here I don't compete in your world. I am making honest observations as an interested observer. I do not dispute that you are better than me, probably in a whole lot of ways. Your knowledge of SEO is probably better than anyone on this forum and I am not claiming to know much about it. That was not the point I was making. I think we should agree to differ on the fundamental point and try and remain civilised. And before someone jumps in and deletes the thread can I say that I will not post on this subject again.

dpf -> RE: articles and seo (5/11/2006 19:12:46)
quote: I am saying that all SEO is wrong because it is making the search engines come up with results that are vastly different from what they would be without SEO. For example without SEO sites would be ranked purely on their content which would give a fairer ranking system. Donkey: good points but I disagree on that one. no matter what criteria SE's use, it is human nature and fundamentally important for business sites and not "wrong" to try to have their site rank as high as possible. the O is for optimizing - understanding how the SEs rank and trying to make your site optimaly conform. If you feed your family selling steam cleaners and find your site ranking on page 100, surely you dont think it wrong to try to move up? as to this: <quote>For example without SEO sites would be ranked purely on their content </quote> Google or Yahoo could rank solely on content any time the please..but as soon as they do, SEO becomes all about content.

Spooky -> RE: articles and seo (5/11/2006 20:08:39)
The original topic of this thread "hi does anyone know if posting articles on my site will help with SEO " definitely no longer applies As BD mentioned, please start a new thread if you wish to discuss the finer details

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.0625