|
| |
|
|
Nicole
Posts: 2800 Joined: 9/15/2004 From: Nambucca / Kempsey, Australia Status: offline
|
Google's disregarded my meta description? - 11/9/2006 3:48:44
When updating my site to reflect my new location I made a few mistakes and only updated the opening page totally and the other pages partly. I know it's my fault, but when I was finally picked up by Google some 2 weeks later I was ranking 304th for my main key phrase, a fairly simple one to achieve good rankings with I thought based on the competition here and that all of them use tables for layout. I mention about 6 other place names on my opening page and having done this in my last location which was slightly easier thean here, I think the best I'm doing is 7th for a nearby town with a population of just over 1,000, pretty pathetic stuff up huh? I've gone and made the changes that I should've made in the first place and am now having to sit back for another month waiting to rank in the top couple, but what concerns me is that I only changed place names, i.e. the hidden text behind my banner, and the place names in the bottom section of my opening page (and now I've changed page titles for all other pages), but when Google picked up these pages a week or so ago it disregarded my meta description and plucked something out of my page links (the left include) and displays my "page descriptions" as seen in the image below. Does anyone know why forgetting to replace all old locations in the meta tags with the new location would've suddenly caused Google to think that the on-hover link description of my strategy page was more important than my meta description? Does anyone also know whether this situation will be rectified now that I've corrected all place names in the meta tags and content? Nicole Thumbnail Image
Edit: I'm getting a yellow and black error message for that image? The link should work though, if not, search google for "nambucca web design", I'm ranking about 13th I'm sorry to say.
Attachment (1)
< Message edited by Nicole -- 11/9/2006 6:12:17 >
_____________________________
Nambucca Valley & Kempsey Web Design | NixDesign Get Netscape Navigator 9
|
|
|
|
Nicole
Posts: 2800 Joined: 9/15/2004 From: Nambucca / Kempsey, Australia Status: offline
|
RE: Google's disregarded my meta description? - 11/9/2006 6:15:51
Thanks Jaybee, Just tried to reload a new image but I got the same yellow and black error message. Nambucca was just one of the examples, Coffs Harbour is the main one and it appears the same way. I will wait for Google to re-crawl the site, but I wondered if there was anything I can do in the meantime to make sure it doesn't happen like this again. Nicole
_____________________________
Nambucca Valley & Kempsey Web Design | NixDesign Get Netscape Navigator 9
|
|
|
|
Nicole
Posts: 2800 Joined: 9/15/2004 From: Nambucca / Kempsey, Australia Status: offline
|
RE: Google's disregarded my meta description? - 11/9/2006 16:00:24
uh ha! But I'm not based IN Coffs Harbour. I'm anout 100km inland and am also 100km from 2 other large towns. Coffs Harbour is the best SEO wise and a couple of those other towns are quite touristy so that's wht they were included. Unlike Albury Woodonga which was unique and it accurately described the region, there is no accurate regional description for where I am now. Anyway, I might delete the NSW north coast as you mention. Nicole
_____________________________
Nambucca Valley & Kempsey Web Design | NixDesign Get Netscape Navigator 9
|
|
|
|
Nicole
Posts: 2800 Joined: 9/15/2004 From: Nambucca / Kempsey, Australia Status: offline
|
RE: Google's disregarded my meta description? - 3/31/2007 18:46:22
Okay, I've given Google long enough to get it right and what I wrote about back in November is still happening, but . . . I've noticed something interesting. If I do a search for words or a phrase that IS in my keywords, description, headings or page content, then the description that appears under my listing in Google is correct as in the example in the first image. But If I search for a combination of words that aren'r necessarily grouped together in the content, headings, description or keywords, then the silly "Strategy" thing is still occuring as seen in the second image. I also have a further question. I appear in Google for some phrases, and not in Google Australia? Is this crazy? Or is it because my site is hosted in America? I have a .au domain name though. Thumbnail Image
Attachment (1)
_____________________________
Nambucca Valley & Kempsey Web Design | NixDesign Get Netscape Navigator 9
|
|
|
|
DebSpecs
Posts: 101 Joined: 1/4/2007 From: NY Status: offline
|
RE: Google's disregarded my meta description? - 4/2/2007 16:13:45
Though not a web designer, I do run an online web business. We once dropped completely off Google for our main keyword, and i noticed that our webmaster had changed not the meta keywords or description, but the Title Bar. A simple resetting of our major keywords in the title bar, and we were back on the first page within a day or two. Have you tried to fit as many keywords here as possible, to see the effect on SE ranking? Good luck!
|
|
|
|
Reflect
Posts: 4767 From: USA Status: offline
|
RE: Google's disregarded my meta description? - 4/3/2007 7:41:16
I always heard the maximum is 63 characters for page title. Take care, Brian
_____________________________
|
|
|
|
DebSpecs
Posts: 101 Joined: 1/4/2007 From: NY Status: offline
|
RE: Google's disregarded my meta description? - 4/4/2007 9:17:40
The page title isn't long, and i didn't mean they should be "stuffed" with keywords, but I have seen first hand how choosing the proper keywords in the page title can be more effective than having good meta keywords. Of course, all the other factors, such as inbound links, etc, are important in conjunction with this, but that page title does help.
|
|
|
|
DebSpecs
Posts: 101 Joined: 1/4/2007 From: NY Status: offline
|
RE: Google's disregarded my meta description? - 4/4/2007 15:45:38
Sign me up for your Google Utopia!
|
|
|
|
Asiadeep
Posts: 6 Joined: 5/24/2007 Status: offline
|
RE: Google's disregarded my meta description? - 6/5/2007 13:04:26
I've had this also happen to me. It refused to take up the META description but took something from a sentence somewhere at the top if the index page. I just changed the META to something else, more like rewording it then after the next spider came by it changed back to the META. Give it a try, it might work for you too.
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|