|
caz -> RE: UK Companies to update websites and email footers before 2007 (12/24/2006 14:38:50)
|
As far as I can see this is just a harmonising step and we would already have that information on our sites - the thing that is different to a degree is it's inclusion in emails as footers. quote:
Service providers, whether involved in e-commerce or not, should provide the following minimum information, which must be easily, directly and permanently accessible: * The name of the service provider must be given somewhere easily accessible on the site. This might differ from the trading name and any such difference should be explained – e.g. "XYZ.com is the trading name of XYZ Enterprises Limited." * The email address of the service provider must be given. It is not sufficient to include a 'contact us' form without also providing an email address. * The geographic address of the service provider must be given. A PO Box is unlikely to suffice as a geographic address; but a registered office address would. If the business is a company, the registered office address must be included in any event. * If a company, the company's registration number should also be given. * If a company, the place of registation should be stated (e.g. "XYZ Enterprises Limited is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1234567") though this is a requirement of the Companies Act as from 31st December 2006, not the E-commerce Directive. * If the business is a member of a trade or professional association, membership details, including any registration number, should be provided. * If the business has a VAT number, it should be stated – even if the website is not being used for e-commerce transactions. * Prices on the web site must be clear and unambiguous. Also, state whether prices are inclusive of tax and delivery costs. * Finally, do not forget the Distance Selling Regulations which contain other information requirements for on-line businesses that sell to consumers (B2C, as opposed to B2B, sales). For details of these requirements, see our article, The Distance Selling Regulations - An Overview. Out-Law For my part I don't want email addresses to be "in the clear" which is why I am using Mike Cherim's form ( but I did get spam addressed to "Michael" from one test site). This method (contact forms) appears not to satisfy the regulations. I agree that more information could have been sent to us about this a lot sooner than it has - and more publicity given to it rather than it being flagged up by The Register. [&:]
|
|
|
|