|
| |
|
|
Tailslide
Posts: 5972
Joined: 5/10/2005
From: Out here on the raggedy edge
Status: offline
 |
RE: W3C Standards, is it worth the hassle ? - 2/8/2007 14:05:56
Ok so the issue is that Expressions is making it hard for you rather than CSS itself making it difficult?
_____________________________
"My strategy is so simple an idiot could have devised it"
Little Blue Plane Web Design | Blood, Sweat & Rust - A Land Rover restoration project
|
|
|
|
fp2003uk
Posts: 47
Joined: 1/30/2006
Status: offline
|
RE: W3C Standards, is it worth the hassle ? - 2/8/2007 14:34:27
Maybe it is just expressions but as its my chosen package I dont have a choice.
All I can tell you is that if I use float right and float left to get everything positioned nicely it then does something different in ie and ffox, usually too high or too low or way off the edge of the container, and after endless tweaking and testing with all the new css positioning commands presented to me I still have to revert to a good old fashioned table to get what I want.
I think this may be down to css not working in a wysiwyg the way tables do ?
Take one of the ew templates and open it up in wysiwyg mode, you will notice the image is on the left and under the text, but open it up in a browser and the image jumps across to the right, even though its still not aligned properly.
If this is how you have to work with css then I doubt I will ever use it fully because each website will involve far more 'previewing time' than the table route.
I doubt any of that made sense but would like to ask this:
Can any of you open up an unmodified, untouched ew template and have it view correctly in the browser ?
| |
|
 New Messages |
 No New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
 Locked w/ New Messages |
 Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|
Printable Version 
