|
womble -> RE: My Site's disappeared from google overnight?? (3/24/2008 7:53:21)
|
quote:
Would you suggest/recommend that I go to my purchased Domain names - that I don't want my competitors to get - and just "forward" them to the site that I am putting all my content on (i.e. my main site). Yep, that's what I'd do. Sorry I didn't make that clear. My understanding, from what you'd said, was that you'd got two (two, for the sake of argument) sites - i.e. two full blown sites with hosting and a physical site on each site, and that what you were proposing was to put a redirect on one of those sites to send visitors to the other site? I think maybe I got confused between "forwarding" and "redirecting" too. In my case, take a couple of sites I have. Site #1 I use a .co.uk domain, and it's that domain my hosting is linked with, but, I also own the .com, .net, and .org TLDs for the domain name. In that case I simply asked my host to park the .com, .net, and .org domains onto my hosting (actually, my hosts are pretty good and had already done that for me when I bought the hosting and the domains. The actual domain I use is www.site#1.co.uk, but now even if someone enters www.site#1.com, www.site#1.net, or www.site#1.org, what'll show in their address bar is the content they get is www.site#1.co.uk - there's no content at all attached to the .com, .net, and .org domains - they just point to the .co.uk hosting. On another site I have, let's call it Site #2, again I have the TLD variations for the domain name. I also have a mis-spelling of the domain name, and all of those are parked onto the hosting for site #2 by my hosts (though I can set new parking up in my cPanel as well). On that site though I also have another domain, that used to be a separate site - I'll call that site #3. About a year ago I decided to merge the two sites, and the content from site #3 got largely put onto site #2. The two domains are totally different, but I don't want to lose any traffic I might get from site #3, either because it's listed in a directory somewhere or if someone bookmarked the old site. Site #3 is no longer in existence - there's no hosting there, nothing, just the domain name, and the content from what used to be site #3 is now on site #2. With the domain for that site it's with a different domain registrar, and I have access to the control panel for that domain (I could have transferred the domain to where my hosting is and simply got them to park it, but at the time it seemed easier to leave it where it was with it's current registrar). In that instance, all I did was log into my control panel for the domain, and where the set-up information for the domain is, for the nameservers to use, I simply entered the IP addresses of the namservers of the hosting for site #2, so, even if someone types www.site#3.com in the address bar of their browser, where they end up is www.site#2.com. That's five domains all pointing to just one hosting account. I have all the variations of the domain names so any competitors can't get them, but I only have the cost, and the hassle of maintaining one hosting account and one site. That make it any clearer, or have I just confused it even more? [:D] I'm not sure what the SEO implications are of parking domains, but I would think it'd be a much more preferable alternative to having sites with duplicate content.
|
|
|
|