OutFront Forums
     Home    Register     Search      Help      Login    

Follow Us
On Facebook
On Twitter
RSS
Via Email

Recent Posts
Todays Posts
Most Active posts
Posts since last visit
My Recent Posts
Mark posts read

Sponsors
Shopping Cart Software
Ecommerce software integrated into Frontpage, Dreamweaver and Golive templates. No monthly fees and available in ASP and PHP versions.
Website Templates
We also have a wide selection of Dreamweaver, Expression Web and Frontpage templates as well as webmaster tools and CSS layouts.
Frontpage website templates
Creative Website Templates for FrontPage, Dreamweaver, Flash, SwishMax

 

Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move to Dreamweaver?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
Printable Version 

All Forums >> Web Development >> Microsoft FrontPage Help >> Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move to Dreamweaver?
Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
 
Peter

 

Posts: 215
From: Edinburgh
Status: offline

 
Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move to D... - 9/24/2008 17:56:41   
I've been updating and publishing my www.edinphoto.org.uk web site successfully, almost daily since 2002, but I have not been able to publish it for the past few days because Fasthosts, the company that hosts my web site has had problems with the FP extensions for the site.

1. Today, they told me:

"We note that your site has grown to a size with is significantly larger that Frontpage Extensions is designed to work with. We see that the site currently consists of in excess of 83,000 files. Frontpage Extensions, as a general rule of thumb, will have re-occurring problems with any site that has over 8,000 files, so we would recommend that you look into finding an alternative to Frontpage and Frontpage Extensions given the size of the site."

2. I take this to mean that I should consider moving to a program other than FrontPage or ExpressionWeb to update and publish changes to my web site. e.g. Dreamweaver.

I don't know how easy this would be. I have no familiarity with any web site programs other than FrontPage, and a brief look at a Dreamweaver manual suggests that it could take me a long time to become comfortable using Dreamweaver.

Currently, I'm not trying to do anything very clever with FrontPage. I'm not using FrontPage guest book, search or page counter, but I do rely on FrontPage themes to give the page backgrounds, default colours (and possibly the top and botom borders?).

If I moved to, say, Dreamweaver I would presumably have to tell it what to do for page backgrunds, default colours, top and bottom borders (and anything else that FrontPage extensions is doing for me that I've forgotten about).

I would appreciate your comment on what I have written above to help me to decide whether or not to consider a move to Dreamweaver.

Thank you for your help.

- Peter
treetopsranch

 

Posts: 1539
From: Cottage Grove, OR, USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/24/2008 21:28:44   
quote:

83,000
files? What the heck are you displaying on your site that would require so many files? Photos?

_____________________________

Don from TreeTops Ranch, Oregon

"I've got a taste for quality and luxury"


(in reply to Peter)
Tailslide

 

Posts: 6692
Joined: 5/10/2005
From: Out here on the raggedy edge
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/25/2008 2:37:01   
It's not the software as such that will help you - it's the way the site is constructed. With that quantity of content you'd really really want a database to house the information and then just spit back what's requested. It's the most efficient way of storing large quantities of information.

_____________________________

Little Blue Plane Web Design | Land Rover project

:)

(in reply to treetopsranch)
Peter

 

Posts: 215
From: Edinburgh
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/25/2008 4:44:51   
Hi Treetopsranch:

1.
The site is so large because it includes the results of my research, carried out over several years, into the history of photography in Edinburgh.

It has about 11,000 pictures and a similar number of thumbnail images - old engravings, old photos, recent photos, etc.

It has about 16,000 pages , covering the history of photography, history of Edinburgh, recollections of Edinburgh, news about Edinburgh today, etc.

Do have a look at the site: www.edinphoto.org.uk - but please note that at the moment the FrontPage extensions don't appear to be working on the site, so it looks rather untidy. i.e. I'm no longer getting the default font and colours that I should have for the site, and the top and bottom borders (that usually show links to each of the sections of the site and back to the home page) have vanished.

2.

Do you have any comments on how easy it might be for me to change from FrontPage to Dreamweaver for updating and publishing this site?

- Peter

(in reply to Peter)
Peter

 

Posts: 215
From: Edinburgh
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/25/2008 5:00:40   
Hi Tailslide:

Thanks for your comments about using a database.

1.
Even without using a database, I have found it easy to update the site, and the response times for the site on the internet seem good.

If I had used a database when I originally created my www.edinphoto.org.uk web site, that would have been good. But I've written anything as a database.

I feel that it may not be practical for me to change what I already have on the web site into database format, unless there was some way of automatically doing that. Is there? If I had to do it manually, even if I could make the changes to each of my 16,000 pages at the rate of one page a minute, and get them all right, it would still be 267 hours work!

2.
If I continued to use FrontPage but changed to a database, I might still get the same problem with Fasthosts, the company that hosts my web site. i.e. I might find that FrontPage Extensions had 'gone down' for my site on their server, and they might tell me that I could not expect FrontPage Extensions to be reliable for a site of my size.

So now I have two questions to consider.
a) Would it be practical for me to change to using a database?
AND
b) Would it be practical for me to change from using FrontPage to using Dreamweaver to update and publish the web site?

- Peter




(in reply to Peter)
jeepless

 

Posts: 230
Joined: 12/20/2003
From: Smack in the middle of USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/25/2008 8:26:23   
One of my clients ran into a similar problem, although they didn't have anywhere near as many files as you do. What they did was took a few of the largest sections (folders) of their site and converted them to individual subwebs. Frontpage will manage subwebs separately, so the effect was to substantially decrease the size of their root web. And because your new subwebs are still nothing more than folders like they originally were, I believe Frontpage doesn't need to regenerate any links that lead to their content. I would think this is much less work than attempting to convert your site over to a database-driven one.


_____________________________

The problem with designing a system that's foolproof is that designers underestimate complete fools.

(in reply to Peter)
coreybryant

 

Posts: 2625
Joined: 3/17/2002
From: Castle Rock CO USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/25/2008 10:22:46   
If you are not using any of the FP components (like the guestbook / search) - consider going to Expression Web. But with this move to Expression Web (or Dreamweaver) you need to consider using CSS to help you (How to Create a Style Sheet). And then you can use FTP to upload the information.

With the pictures, you might consider using some type of photo album script that will help you maintain those better. Plus with the EW FTP, you won't have as many of those _vti folders which count towards the number of files. About ten years ago when I was with Hostway, they had a number of file limit (5,000). I could not publish any longer when I had a site over 2,500 files and Hostway upped my limit to 10,000. After a few months, I hit that again and Hostway upped my limit to 20,000. I never had a problem with publishing or anything.

It might take you some time to convert to CSS but if a lot of the code is the same, a copy and replace might help but don't forget to create a backup copy of your website locally before making any major changes.

_____________________________

Corey R. Bryant
My Merchant Account Blog | Expression Web Blog

(in reply to jeepless)
Peter

 

Posts: 215
From: Edinburgh
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/25/2008 14:37:09   
Hi Jeepless:

Thanks for the suggestion that I use sub-webs. From what little I know about the subject, that sounds like an easy solution, if it works. I'll read a bit more about sub-webs, but before doing anything, I'll speak again to Fasthosts (the company that hosts my web site) to see if they think that would be likely to overcome the problem of 'FrontPage Extensions going down for my site.

They may well say that it would not help, even if I created several subwebs, because they tell me that the number of files in my web site is now about 10x the number that they feel can comfortably be supported by FrontPage extensions.

From my point of view, I still remain optimistic that if Fasthosts are able to get FrontPage extensions working again, then they may continue to work well, perhaps for another two or three years. They have only gone down once in the last couple of years and I have been publishing updates to the site just about every day - usually several times a day.

But at the moment, I feel helpless because I cannot solve the FrontPage extensions problem myself and I just have to wait to see what Fasthosts can do and when, and they are not able to tell me when I can expect them to have solved the problem.

- Peter.

(in reply to Peter)
Peter

 

Posts: 215
From: Edinburgh
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/25/2008 15:26:42   
Hi creybryant:

Thanks for your reply. What a lot of suggestions!

From my point of view, I'm not trying to do anything very clever. I just want to be able to continue to update the content of my web site. I have a large backlog of material to add to the web site, so I'd like to concentrate on adding that to the site, rather than spend time learning anything technical unless it's absolutely necessary.

You'll see from my questions below that my understanding some of your suggestions is very limited.

1. So far as I am aware, at the moment, the only reason that I have for making any change to the way that the site is set up and updated is to overcome the problem of FrontPage Extensions having gone down - assuming Fasthosts (who host my web site) tell me that they are unable to reinstall FrontPage Extensions successfully, or that I am likely to have ongoing problems with FPE.

2. You suggest that I consider moving to Experession Web. Is that because it should overcome the 'FrontPage Extensions' problem or for some other reason? Even if the number of _vti folders (whatever they are!) reduced, the number of files in my web would remail very much higher than Fasthosts recommend for a site using FPE. Fasthosts is the company that hosts my web site.

If you haver some other reason for suggesting a possible move to ExpressionWeb, can you tell me more. Thanks.

I actually have a copy of Expression web that I've bought but never used, because FrontPage continued to work well for me.

3. I had assumed that ExpressionWeb was really just newer release of FrontPage, and so it would need FrontPage Extensions to be installed on the server for my site, just as FrontPage does. But, are you tellimg me that if I started to use Expression Web AND used CSS, then FrontPage Extensions would not be needed?

4. Would it be likely to be easier for me to move to "Expression Web + CSS" than to move to "Dreamweaver + CSS". Which would you recommend? If I'm making such a change, I'd like to be sure that I make the right choice and don't regret it later.

5. You say that I might consider using some type of photo album, but in fact, I'm happy with the way that my photos are included on the web site. Adding the photos individually, myself, is not difficult and avoids the possible constraints that a photo album might impose - and it works so I'd prefer not to change it!

6. You say that it may take some time to convert to CSS, and say that" if a lot of the code is the same, a copy and replace might help". In fact I would hope that I don't have to go anywhere near the code.

I can see from viewing my www.edinphoto.org.uk web site on the internet at the moment, just how it looks without FrontPage Extensions working. Most of it is intelligibel, but it looks very untidy, and is missing some links at the top and bottom of pages.

If I moved to CSS, I would like there to be a simple way for me to tell CSS to follow the front page 'Style' that I am currently using. In particular, for:
- Aerial font to be used throughout the site.
- The lines at the top and bottom of my home page (images with links) to appear at the top and bottom of all pages.
If I could do that easily, it would go a long way to making my web site more presentable and usable for others.
How easy do you thing it would be for me to get CSS to achieve that?


7. I'll take your advice on keeping a back-up copy of the site locally before doing anything major. In fact, I make all the changes to my site locally, then publish them periodically, and I keep copies of the site usually about 1,2,3 4,30 days ago, on my PC for back-up.

- Peter

(in reply to Peter)
coreybryant

 

Posts: 2625
Joined: 3/17/2002
From: Castle Rock CO USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/25/2008 16:22:47   

quote:

1. So far as I am aware, at the moment, the only reason that I have for making any change to the way that the site is set up and updated is to overcome the problem of FrontPage Extensions having gone down - assuming Fasthosts (who host my web site) tell me that they are unable to reinstall FrontPage Extensions successfully, or that I am likely to have ongoing problems with FPE.

Well you could use FTP to upload your website, but Frontpage's FTP is not that great. Check out Publishing From Remote Server to Local Computer - this post will help you in knowing what (if any) FrontPage components you are using that will require FPSE. And if you start to use FTP, the FPSE will become corrupt.

If the hosting company is having problems (re)installing the FPSE and you are on Windows, ask them to remove the FPSE. And then, if any _vti folders are in the website, delete them. The hosting company will have to do this or you will need to use an FTP client (like FileZilla) to see if these folders are there. Once these files are deleted, re-install FPSE.

quote:

2. You suggest that I consider moving to Experession Web. Is that because it should overcome the 'FrontPage Extensions' problem or for some other reason? Even if the number of _vti folders (whatever they are!) reduced, the number of files in my web would remail very much higher than Fasthosts recommend for a site using FPE. Fasthosts is the company that hosts my web site.

Suggesting the move to Expression Web was basically because it is a new version. And you are already familiar with FrontPage, so there would not be too much of a learning curve.

Install Expression Web - you can have both (FrontPage and Expression Web) on your computer. That way you can see what you think of it.

quote:

3. I had assumed that ExpressionWeb was really just newer release of FrontPage, and so it would need FrontPage Extensions to be installed on the server for my site, just as FrontPage does. But, are you tellimg me that if I started to use Expression Web AND used CSS, then FrontPage Extensions would not be needed?

No, Frontpage Server Extensions are not needed for you to create a Microsoft Expression Web Site.

FPSE are only needed if you are using the http (publish) instead of FTP (and then of course the FrontPage components that I spoke about before).

quote:

4. Would it be likely to be easier for me to move to "Expression Web + CSS" than to move to "Dreamweaver + CSS". Which would you recommend? If I'm making such a change, I'd like to be sure that I make the right choice and don't regret it later.

I would recommend Expression Web - you can have both (FrontPage and Expression Web) on your computer.

quote:

5. You say that I might consider using some type of photo album, but in fact, I'm happy with the way that my photos are included on the web site. Adding the photos individually, myself, is not difficult and avoids the possible constraints that a photo album might impose - and it works so I'd prefer not to change it!

Then no need to. I used Frontpage for years to add photo albums, etc. But then I saw how a photo album worked. There is basically one page and the code on that page reads the information from the database. So if you have a lot of HTML pages, this would be a great advantage over all those HTML pages.

quote:

6. You say that it may take some time to convert to CSS, and say that" if a lot of the code is the same, a copy and replace might help". In fact I would hope that I don't have to go anywhere near the code.

I can see from viewing my www.edinphoto.org.uk web site on the internet at the moment, just how it looks without FrontPage Extensions working. Most of it is intelligibel, but it looks very untidy, and is missing some links at the top and bottom of pages.

If I moved to CSS, I would like there to be a simple way for me to tell CSS to follow the front page 'Style' that I am currently using. In particular, for:
- Aerial font to be used throughout the site.
- The lines at the top and bottom of my home page (images with links) to appear at the top and bottom of all pages.
If I could do that easily, it would go a long way to making my web site more presentable and usable for others.
How easy do you thing it would be for me to get CSS to achieve that?

Expression Web will help you create a style sheet - How to Create a Style Sheet / Apply a Style Sheet. Using astyle sheet, everything is in one place so there is usually no problem with consistency of your design / layout.

In your style sheet, you could have something like
font-family: Arial, Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif;

This would apply the Arial font to all the page unless of course you overwrite the CSS by using something like
<p style="font-family:'Times New Roman', Times, serif">Times New Roman</p>

Or (using Frontpage), it will usually use the deprecated HTML method
<font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">Times New Roman</font>

Using this method, chances are the <font> element is everywhere in your webpage. You would need to do a massive makeover to delete all these instances. Using the style sheet, one change on one page and everything is updated.

quote:

7. I'll take your advice on keeping a back-up copy of the site locally before doing anything major. In fact, I make all the changes to my site locally, then publish them periodically, and I keep copies of the site usually about 1,2,3 4,30 days ago, on my PC for back-up.

That's good to hear. So many people still rely fully on their live site which will usually cause problems sooner or later.


_____________________________

Corey R. Bryant
My Merchant Account Blog | Expression Web Blog

(in reply to Peter)
Peter

 

Posts: 215
From: Edinburgh
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/26/2008 4:47:25   
Hi Coreybryant:

That's a very helpful reply that you sent me. Thanks also for sending the links.

1. After reading your reply, I've decided that I'd like to try:
- moving to Expression Web to update and publish my site
- to use CSS and
- to have the FrontPage Extensions removed for my site.

2. I'll try that within the next few days, unless anybody suggests good reason for not doing it. I expect I'll have more questions as I try it, but for the moment, you have answered just about everything for me.


3. I have just two questions at this stage:

Q1.

You say: "In your style sheet, you could have something like
font-family: Arial, Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif;
This would apply the Arial font to all the page unless ...."

(Sorry, I've not yet discovered how to put that into one of the little Outfront 'quote boxes')

Is there something similar in the style sheet that would let me set the same background for all pages, and set the same top and bottom borders for all pages, and if so, is there any warning that you would give me before I try to do that?


Q2.

You say: "Frontpage's FTP is not that great."
Would you also say "Expression Web's FTP is not that great."?
Can you tell me why, and do you recommend that I should use another program for my FTP? If so which?


Thanks again for helping me to understand this topic, before I go too far in the wrong direction with my changes!


- Peter

(in reply to Peter)
caz

 

Posts: 3742
Joined: 10/10/2001
From: Somewhere south of Chester, UK
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/26/2008 5:36:22   
Peter, what Corey has told you is probably the best way forward for you with such a large site and you could do what I did with a large site when I was moving to CSS and xhtml, that is to work on a copy of the site locally and use a subweb (subsite) for testing some pages. This leaves the existing site untouched until you are ready for the new version to "go live", then you just change the file names, for example your new home page could have been edinburghetc/test/index.html which you would change to edinburghetc/index.html and upload using Filezilla. I use Filezilla too rather than any inbuilt FTP option for no other reason than I didn't trust the inbuilt FP FTP and old habits die hard. :)

CSS stylesheets will handle your page backgrounds for you, but if you have Shared Borders you would be better replacing them with Include pages. FP had a nifty way of using Bots to do this using included pages and the principle is the same in EW without the junk code.

An introduction to using EW is on site here at http://www.firstexpression.com/ and there is a handy plug-in for Microsoft Expression Web that re-enables the ability to insert FrontPage Include pages, Search Forms, Hit Counters, and Photo Galleries from the Insert menu in Microsoft Expression Web. The FP Bot Macro also re-enables the Database Results Wizard (DRW) and adds the "Spooky Diet" macro to clean up the DRW code, http://www.firstexpression.com/quicktips/free-tools.htm

This is obviously not a quick fix for you but it will pay you in the long run to move away from FP now (and keep your host happy!).

_____________________________

I remember when it took less than 4hrs to fly across the Atlantic.

(in reply to Peter)
Peter

 

Posts: 215
From: Edinburgh
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/26/2008 7:10:01   
Hi Caz:

Thanks for your reply, and for the links that you provided.

1. It's encouraging to me to read your comments that "what Corey has told me is probably the best way forward". It certainly sound like a good move for me to make for the longer term, and better done now rather than later, so I'll see how quickly I can make the change.


2. Thanks for the advice on possibly using a test site, but perhaps that will not be necessary because of the way I do my updating. I do all the updates on my local PC, then publish the updates at least daily, but I also keep copies of the web site at the end of the day (for each of the past few days for back-up). So if I publish, and don't like how it looks, I can go back to "yesterday's version" and publish again.

I think it quite likely that my site will not have its FrontPage Extensions working agian by the time that I try to make the move to Expression Web. So, I'll assume that when I make changes in Expression Web (to set the default font, set the background for pages, add borders) even if I don't get it right first time, the result is likely to be no worse than what is already on the site! I hope that's true.


3. Thanks for telling me that cascading style sheets should be able to handle my page backgrounds. That's good news. I've now bought a book on Expression Web, so I'll read more about that.


4. You recommended use of 'include pages' rather than shared borders. I'll try to follow that advice, but I have a question (three paragraphs below).

I've already made a lot of use of include pages already on my site. They have worked well, and still seem to be working well despite the web site no longer having Front Page Extensions, so I assume they will continue to work when I move to Expression Web.

However, when I have added 'include pages' to the site, I've had to change each page individually to get it to use the appropriate 'include page'.

Q. Is there some way (perhaps on one of the CSS pages) to get Expression Web to add the top and bottom borders (as 'include pages') to ALL pages on the web with a single instruction to do so.

Inidentally, if I am able to use 'include pages' for top and bottom borders on the web site, that would have another advantage.

At present, if I click on a top or botom border while I'm updateing the web site, but forget to hold the CTL key down, FrontPage sometimes thinks that I have made a change to one of these borders. This can result in long delays before I am able to update and publish the site normally again Presumably this would not happen if the top and bottom borders have been set up as 'include pages'.


5. Thanks for telling me about the "handy plug-in for Microsoft Expression Web that re-enables the ability to insert FrontPage Include pages, Search forms, Hit counters, etc."

I think that the only one of these that I would be likely to need is 'include pages'.

However, are you saying that if I did not get this plug-in, it would not be possible for me to add any more 'include pages' when I am using Experession Web (either 'include pages' as part of individual pages or as my replacement for top and bottom borders throughout the web site as you suggest above)?


Thanks for you help.

- Peter Stubbs.



(in reply to Peter)
Donkey

 

Posts: 4028
Joined: 11/13/2001
From: Blackfield United Kingdom
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/26/2008 9:19:23   
If you are going away from FP you can use server side includes or php includes. Actually php "requires" are better to use than "includes" for reasons explained on the tutorial if you follow the link.

Both are very easy to use, I prefer SSI, but have used both.

_____________________________

:)

I have a higher and grander standard of principle than George Washington. He could not lie; I can, but I won't.
Samuel Clemens

(in reply to Peter)
coreybryant

 

Posts: 2625
Joined: 3/17/2002
From: Castle Rock CO USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/26/2008 10:11:42   
quote:

2. Thanks for the advice on possibly using a test site, but perhaps that will not be necessary because of the way I do my updating. I do all the updates on my local PC, then publish the updates at least daily, but I also keep copies of the web site at the end of the day (for each of the past few days for back-up). So if I publish, and don't like how it looks, I can go back to "yesterday's version" and publish again.

I think it quite likely that my site will not have its FrontPage Extensions working agian by the time that I try to make the move to Expression Web. So, I'll assume that when I make changes in Expression Web (to set the default font, set the background for pages, add borders) even if I don't get it right first time, the result is likely to be no worse than what is already on the site! I hope that's true.

Create a subsite / subweb and publish that web to the specific subweb. For example, the subweb is example and your domain name www.example.com. You will publish your FrontPage (main) web to http://www.example.com just like you have always done.

Then you can publish your subweb / subsite. Make sure this is open in Frontpage and choose http://www.example.com/example and this will not affect your main website.
quote:

4. You recommended use of 'include pages' rather than shared borders. I'll try to follow that advice, but I have a question (three paragraphs below).

I've already made a lot of use of include pages already on my site. They have worked well, and still seem to be working well despite the web site no longer having Front Page Extensions, so I assume they will continue to work when I move to Expression Web.

However, when I have added 'include pages' to the site, I've had to change each page individually to get it to use the appropriate 'include page'.

Q. Is there some way (perhaps on one of the CSS pages) to get Expression Web to add the top and bottom borders (as 'include pages') to ALL pages on the web with a single instruction to do so.

Inidentally, if I am able to use 'include pages' for top and bottom borders on the web site, that would have another advantage.

At present, if I click on a top or botom border while I'm updateing the web site, but forget to hold the CTL key down, FrontPage sometimes thinks that I have made a change to one of these borders. This can result in long delays before I am able to update and publish the site normally again Presumably this would not happen if the top and bottom borders have been set up as 'include pages'.

Make sure these are not FrontPage Includes but Server Side Includes (SSI. If you are sing FrontPage includes, Expression Web will support them but for how long is anyone's guess.

SSI will handle your footer / header / nav / etc. For example, if you take a look at file includes it has a ZIP file that contains some basic information on how to include them and the benefits. And if you look at my site, you will see the navigation on the left. And you can see the navigation as well on that page. It is using a list but I use CSS
#navcontainer
{
width: 140px;
border-right: 1px solid #000;
padding: 0 0 1em 0;
margin-bottom: 1em;
font-family: Verdana, Lucida, Geneva, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;
background-color: #001F7A;
color: #333;
text-align: left;
}

#navcontainer ul
{
list-style: none;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
border: none;
}

#navcontainer li
{
border-bottom: 1px solid #90bade;
margin: 0;
}

#navcontainer li a
{
display: block;
padding: 5px 5px 5px 0.5em;
border-left: 10px solid #001F7A;
border-right: 10px solid #001F7A;
background-color: #2175bc;
color: #fff;
text-decoration: none;
width: 100%;
}

html>body #navcontainer li a { width: auto; }

#navcontainer li a:hover
{
border-left: 10px solid #1c64d1;
border-right: 10px solid #5ba3e0;
background-color: #2586d7;
color: #fff;
}
to help display it properly. And if I ever wanted to make the blue background a different color, I need to only change it on the style sheet.

_____________________________

Corey R. Bryant
My Merchant Account Blog | Expression Web Blog

(in reply to Donkey)
Peter

 

Posts: 215
From: Edinburgh
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/26/2008 13:46:15   
Hi Donkey, Coreybryant and Caz.

I thought everything was becoming farily straighforward until I read the last two messages above this afternoon.

TESTING: Coreybriant: I'll read your comments about creating a sub-web, again if I feel that I need to do that, but I'm at about the limit of my understanding with just the one web!

So, I still feel that it would probably be easier for me to make the changes to the current copy of the web held on my PC and publish that each time. If anything happens that I don't like, when I publish, I can revert to one of the recent days' copies of the web site that I have saved on my PC for back-up.


INCLUDE PAGES: Donkey + Coreybryant: I'll read the comments about Server Side Includes, and check if my host would support them, but it sounds more complicated than the FrontPage includes that I am familiar with.

I probably have thousands of Front Page includes embedded throughout my web site, so I'm a bit concerned about Coreybriant's comment: "Expression Web will support them, but for how long is anybody's guess."

As I already have so many FrontPage Includes in the site, maybe adding more would not be too bad. i.e. If Exrpression Web stops supporting them, then I would have a big problem, whether or not I add any more from here on.

Perhaps I'll be able to get used to SSIs, and find that my host can support them and that they are reliable, but I expect it would be much easier for me to continue to use the FrontPage includes that I am familiar with.

Caz: Would I need to get the "handy plug-in" that you mention in order to be able to add FrontPage includes when I'm updating the site in Experession Web?
What is the name of the plug-in?
Would the plug-in let me use the FrontPage Includes BOTH for includes on individual pages AND to create my top and bottom borders?


All: Sorry if it sound that I am a bit reluctant to follow suggestions about testing and CSSs, but - apart from the big decision to move to Expression Web and SSIs - I'd prefer not to have to learn anything else new at the moment.

I still have a large backlog of material to add to my web site, so it's going to be difficult to find the time to make the change to Expression Web and CSSs. I hope it turns out OK, and is not too complicated for me, and does not take up too much of my time.


- Peter.



(in reply to Peter)
coreybryant

 

Posts: 2625
Joined: 3/17/2002
From: Castle Rock CO USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/26/2008 15:17:45   

quote:

TESTING: Coreybriant: I'll read your comments about creating a sub-web, again if I feel that I need to do that, but I'm at about the limit of my understanding with just the one web!

Create a subweb for testing the file includes, etc. That's all - it is simple and simple is good.

Most, if not all hosting companies will support server side includes. Take a look at Server Side Includes for a bit more information and an example website that uses includes. Server Side Includes are very easy to use. You will probably have to rename the files though so that the pages can be parsed before being delivered on the browser. This was one of the reasons I switched to ASP years ago, to use Server Side includes.

On a *NIX Machine, you can tell the server to parse .html as .shtml files, but you would need to check with your hosting company.

You don't even need to publish the new subweb you create. Start by creating the subweb - take baby steps if you have to, but just go slow.

_____________________________

Corey R. Bryant
My Merchant Account Blog | Expression Web Blog

(in reply to Peter)
caz

 

Posts: 3742
Joined: 10/10/2001
From: Somewhere south of Chester, UK
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/26/2008 18:34:24   
Peter, listen to Corey and you won't go wrong. I gave you the link to the EW plug-in only to make EW seem more familiar to you but as you say you would only need the includes then I agree with Corey that SSI's are the way to go, so you don't need the plug-in. I have used PHP includes too, but you probably won't need to use PHP for quite some time - never, if you are averse to learning more than you need to know now!

If you will be using SSI's for your included content then you don't need FP Includes at all - they do the same thing but safely as they are not affected by the withdrawal of FPSE's from your site. You can use includes (SSI's) to replace your Shared Borders as well as included content, but you will have to update each page that uses them if you make changes to them in order for those changes to appear on the site.

One thing you must understand is that this will all take time for you to accomplish site wide, there is no quick fix - if there was we would have found it before now. This is why I suggested using a sub-site for testing, you are will be using a new way of working, with unfamiliar techniques so it makes sense to have a playground to try things out and compare with your existing untouched pages.

One more thing, CSS plays no part in serving included content, borders etc., CSS controls the styling and layout but not what is actually called by the server. Have a look at HTMLDog for tutorials which explain CSS and how to use it.



_____________________________

I remember when it took less than 4hrs to fly across the Atlantic.

(in reply to coreybryant)
Peter

 

Posts: 215
From: Edinburgh
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/27/2008 16:32:14   
Hi All:

Thanks for your comments. I've spent the past 24 hours reading through your comments, the links that you have given me and the links that they led to, and reading my FrontPage and Expression Web books.

I'm almost ready to move towards Expression Web with CSSs, and no FP Extensions.

In some of the comments that I have read, there seem to be a lot of people, like me, with existing FP web sites, who would find real problems if 'FP include' was not available in Expression Web.

However, one of the comments that I have read from Microsoft from Microsoft is encouraging. The comment is in: http://blogs.msdn.com/xweb/archive/2006/09/09/747051.aspx

It appers to say that FP includes and shared borders will both be supported in Expression Web for sites that already use these features (but not for other sites) and that an add-in will be available to enable new includes to be added to these sites.

That all sound good, especially as my site has about 16,000 pages with top and borders on them all (except the index page) and 'include page' content on many of its pages.


So, taking it in stages, here's what I plan to do next:

1. Use FTP to publish my last week's changes to my www.edinphoto.org.uk web site which has currently lost its FP Extensions. I'll assume that FP Extensions will not be coming back to my site.

2. Use FrontPage, to change the default font to Aerial.

3. Use FTP to publish changes to the site, and see what the site looks like.

4. Make a minor change to the site using Expression Web.

5. Publish again, but this time using FTP from Expression Web.

6. Install the plug-in for Include pages to my Expression Web.

7. Add another include page.

8. Publish again using FT from Expression Web.

9. Think again about what my site looks like and decide what else I need to do for fonts, top and bottom borders, or anything else.

10. Get back to 'business as usual' updating my web site by adding more content to it, but not trying to do anything 'too clever'.


Some time over the next few days, as I work my way through the list above, I expect to be sending another message to Outfront.


I realise that a using SSIs might be more elegant solution, and might well be best for a new site (and might be something that I will have to consider again later) BUT for me, now, I believe that the approach above is probably the one that involves least new learning and the least risk.

The only thing that has gone wrong is that my host tells me that my site has too many files for FP Extensions to be reliable. So what I need to do (if FP Extensions are not going to be reliable for me) is to move away from FP Extensions with the minimum of effort, fuss and risk.

Thanks for your help to date. I've learnt a lot about Expression Web, SSIs, etc. from your answerd, even though my present plan is that set out above.

Incidentally, another reason for continuing with FP includes, rather than move to SSIs, is that I'm currently giving some talks to outside societies using a copy of my web site loaded onto a memory stick, then inserted into other societies' computers and projected using their projectors. These other societies' computers will have windows software that seems to be able to display the web site correctly for me, but if I changed to using SSIs, they woud not be able to display the site correctly.

- Peter.

(in reply to caz)
Peter

 

Posts: 215
From: Edinburgh
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/28/2008 6:31:41   
Hello again:

I've hit a problem already with trying to publish changes to the site.

I've slightly revised my'10 step plan', mentioned above.

The last time that I was able to publish my www.edinphoto.org.uk site successfully was on September 19, 2008. So early this morning, I tried to use ftp within Expression Web to publish a copy of my site that I had saved on September 20 2008. This was very similar to the copy on the live site.

I set the Publishing properties to 'Changed Pages Only' and 'Determine changes by comparing source and destination sites'. The job ran for about eight hours, and came up with two errors:

"Bad parameter passed to web server Extensions. Check the information you entered and try again"
and when I closed that message:
"The web site contains folders used by FrontPage Extensions but you are updating it via FTP or webDAV. Any pages that contain FrontPage specific features such as themes, shared borders or web components will not be updated properly if you save the changes to them and will not render as expected in a browser. To avoid such problems, open the web site using the HTTP address if possible such as http://www.example.com and verify that a FrontPage or SharePoint services version number is shown in the site settings dialog."

I realise that my site contains some FrontPage extension features, but as FrontPage Extensions have not been working for the site for the past few days, and as I cannot expect them to be reliable on a site the size of mine in the future, I reckoned that I would have to find a way to get Expression Web to provide these features.

However, the error message: "The web site contains folders used by FrontPage Extensions but you are updating it via FTP ..." did not appear to give me the option to say "OK but publish anyway".

1. I've sent an email to Fasthosts (who host my web site) to ask them what they recommend I should do now to publish my recent changes to the web site; but I've not yet recieved a response from them to any of the other 3 emails that I've sent over the past 4 days, so it may be a while before I hear from them.

2. I've also changed the Publishing Properties to 'Changed pages only' and 'Use the source file timestamps to determine changes since last published' and tried publishing the site again. The job has been running for a couple of hours so far, which is longer than I would expect when I told it to 'Use source file timestamps.'. It may run successfully, but I'm expecting it to end in an error - possibly the error "The web site contains folders used by FrontPage Extensions but you are updating it via FTP ..."

Does anybody have any recommendations on what I should do next to publish my recent changs to the web site?

Thanks:

- Peter.

(in reply to Peter)
coreybryant

 

Posts: 2625
Joined: 3/17/2002
From: Castle Rock CO USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/28/2008 8:40:27   

quote:

ORIGINAL: Peter

However, the error message: "The web site contains folders used by FrontPage Extensions but you are updating it via FTP ..." did not appear to give me the option to say "OK but publish anyway".

quote:

ORIGINAL: coreybryant

If the hosting company is having problems (re)installing the FPSE and you are on Windows, ask them to remove the FPSE. And then, if any _vti folders are in the website, delete them. The hosting company will have to do this or you will need to use an FTP client (like FileZilla) to see if these folders are there. Once these files are deleted, re-install FPSE.

This is where this part comes in/ If those _vti folders are there, it will make FP think FPSE are installed (properly or not).

_____________________________

Corey R. Bryant
My Merchant Account Blog | Expression Web Blog

(in reply to Peter)
Peter

 

Posts: 215
From: Edinburgh
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/28/2008 11:10:53   
Hi Corey:

Thanks for the reply.

I expected to get a reply from you before I got one from Fasthosts (my hosting company), so that's helpful. But, can I check with you that I'm understanding what you're tlling me before I send another email to the hosting company?

Please see below:

1. Yes, I am a Windows user.
2. I'm planning to do the publishing using Experssion Web ftp, rather than FrontPage.
3. In view of what Fasthosts tell me about FPSE being unlikely to work for my web site (because of the number of files it has) I don't think I'll be wanting them to reinstall FPSE, either now or later.

So here's the message that I thought I'd send to Fasthosts.

Does it sound right to you?


"In the email that I sent to you earlier today, I said 'there is no need for you to spend any more time, for the present at least, trying to reinstall FPSE on my web site'.

Can I now ask you to completely remove FPSE from my web site, and if there are any .vti files on my site, to delete them?

I think this may be necessary to allow me to successfully publish updates to my site, using Expression Web ftp.

I've already tried, twice today, to publish 'changed pages' to the web site. But, both attempts have been unsuccessful, ending with the message: 'The web site contains folders used by FrontPage Extensions but you are updating it via FTP ...'

There does not seem to be an option with this message for me to say 'OK but publish anyway'."



- Peter


(in reply to Peter)
coreybryant

 

Posts: 2625
Joined: 3/17/2002
From: Castle Rock CO USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/28/2008 16:21:53   
I would tell them not to worry about (re-)installing FPSE. As far as asking them to delete anything, I would not. I would not want anyone going into one of my sites and deleting files / folders. If they use Helm control panel, you can remove the extensions yourself. And then download / install FileZilla

Filezilla is a free FTP client, and very easy to use. This will allow you access to your website to see if there are any _vti folders to delete.

_____________________________

Corey R. Bryant
My Merchant Account Blog | Expression Web Blog

(in reply to Peter)
Peter

 

Posts: 215
From: Edinburgh
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/28/2008 18:28:46   
Hi Corey:

Thanks for your latest advice. I thought one of the options you were suggesting in your earlier email was for me to get Fasthosts to remove the .vti folders, but if that's not the case, I'll not ask them to do that.

However, even if, as you say, FileZila is the very easy to use, that's not the sort of area that I have been involved with in the past and not one that I have any confidence at becoming involved in .

So, for the moment, I'll just confirm to Fasthosts that I don't want them to reinstall FPSE, and I'll continue to ask them what they suggest I should do to be able to publish chanmges to the site again.

I have the up to date copy of my web site on my PC, so perhaps the easiest option might be for Fasthosts to remove the site completely from their server, then for me to set it up again by pulishing 'All Pages' by FTP.

I would need to work out whether I should publish using:
(a) FrontPage 'Publish Web)
(b) FrontPage FTP or
(c) Expression Web FTP.

I would also have to decide whether I should remove the Themes from my site before publishing, in order to avoid getting the mesage: 'The web site contains folders used by FrontPage Extensions but you are updating it via FTP ...' again when I published.

However, I've read that for sites built in FrontPage that already use boders and 'include pages', Expression Web will continue to support 'include pages' and 'shared borders' (though I would need to install an Expression Web add-on,to be able to continue to use 'include pages').

Being able to use these is very important to me. In particular, if 'include pages' stopped working for my site, he site will become a real mess, and could take me an enormous amount of time to get it working again, so I don't want to do anything that might put me in that poition.

NOTE:

There must be lots of people who have moved from FrontPage with FPSEs to Expression Web (though perhaps not so many who have done so because their site has too many files for FPSEs to be reliable). So surely there must be a straightforward way forward from here for me. I'll have to think carefully before I take the next step.

Would it be a good idea, do you think, to try to get advice direct from Microsoft, or is Outfront, and Fasthosts (if I can get them to answer my emails) still the best approach.

Thanks.

- Peter.

(in reply to Peter)
coreybryant

 

Posts: 2625
Joined: 3/17/2002
From: Castle Rock CO USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/28/2008 19:11:33   
Well I was suggesting that you find out how your hosting company was removing FPSE or fixing them. It's not really my position to tell them how to run their server(s). I just know from past experience that some hosting companies try to repair FPSE by removing them and extending the site again. FPSE have a repair feature that some hosting companies do not use. I do not know if your hosting company tries to repair the FPSE or just remove them. And removing them really does not completely remove them.

It seems like you are still waiting to hear back from Fasthost about something or another?

But if you are asking me what I would do, knowing what I know. And you said you were on a Windows server and not *NIX. But what about a control panel? I am guessing they have one? Which one? Well that does not matter. I would remove the FPSE. I would then sign in through an FTP client (FileZilla) - and see what FP folders are there (these usually start with an underscore). Then delete these files. Once deleted, then I would install the FPSE. Before publishing, I would go to Tools - Recalcuate Hyperlinks and publish

If it did not work, you have gone through about five days of this and it is apparent the hosting company cannot support your website. And then it would be time to locate another hosting company. And in the meantime, learn about server side includes (whether it be shtml, asp, php, etc) to implement. A website that large cannot be maintained efficiently without the use of CSS / SSI (or a database).

_____________________________

Corey R. Bryant
My Merchant Account Blog | Expression Web Blog

(in reply to Peter)
Peter

 

Posts: 215
From: Edinburgh
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/28/2008 19:52:21   
Hi Corey:

Thanks for another quick resonse.

With that response, and your earlier advice, you've given me plenty to think about, so I don't know when I'll get back to the Outfront forum with any more comments or news about my site.

For about the past five years I have been fully occupied updating the the content of my web site. I enjoy doing that. I still have lots more content to add, and am receiving lots of emails from visitors to the site, telling me about their recollections of Edinburgh for me to add to the site. That has been taking up all of my spare time.

I've not had the need or desire to spend any time considering technical matters (except for about 30 hours spent over the past week, reading and trying to understand the options to sort my current problem with the site. I've not enjoyed doing that!

I really don't have the time or enthusiasm for technical aspects of the web site, so I'm still hoping soon to be able to get back to having a reliable updatable web site that's familiar to me and easy to update - just as it was until last week.

Incidentallly, I do like other aspects of Fasthosts, including the stats that they are able to provide for my site. Their prices seem to me to be very reasonable for a site of my size and the traffic that it receives, and the site has good response times for people visiting it. So, I hope not to have to change host. Let's hope I get the sort of response that I'm looking for on my current problem from the Fasthosts support team over the next few days.

- Peter.

(in reply to Peter)
coreybryant

 

Posts: 2625
Joined: 3/17/2002
From: Castle Rock CO USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/29/2008 9:01:59   
What is the brand name of the stats? Most of the hosting companies use SmarterStats, AWStats, Urchin and a few more that I cannot name at the moment.

_____________________________

Corey R. Bryant
My Merchant Account Blog | Expression Web Blog

(in reply to Peter)
Peter

 

Posts: 215
From: Edinburgh
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/29/2008 10:08:06   
Hi Corey:

1. The brand name of the stats package used by Fasthosts is MatrixStats.
Is that a package that you are familiar with?

2. Incidentally, earlier this morning, Fasthosts got back to me. They have (with my agreement) now removed my www.edinphoto.org.uk web site completely frrom their servers.

They say that they have also removed FrontPage Extensions from the domain, and reset the webspace so I should now be able to use FTP successfully to publish.

I've just run 'Recalculate Hyperlinks' on the copy of the site that I have on my PC, and I'm now about to remove 'FrontPage Themes' from it; then I'll try publising it to the Fasthosts servers, using Expressionweb FTP.

- Peter

(in reply to Peter)
coreybryant

 

Posts: 2625
Joined: 3/17/2002
From: Castle Rock CO USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/29/2008 11:05:38   
Never heard of MatrixStats and doing a quick search just showed some other websites that uses them. Mosting companies have a many options to choose from. When I was hosting (on Windows) we used the SmarterStats. Now I download the raw logs and use a program locally to review them. Fortunately when I sold the hosting company, the new hosting company had the same stats and that pleased the customer.

_____________________________

Corey R. Bryant
My Merchant Account Blog | Expression Web Blog

(in reply to Peter)
Peter

 

Posts: 215
From: Edinburgh
Status: offline

 
RE: Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move ... - 9/30/2008 22:12:11   
Hi:

PUBLISHING QUESTIONS:

I hope I'm getting closer, but can you advise please.

1. I'm wanting to publish using Expression Web FTP, and without FPSEs.

2. Fasthosts (who host my web site) tell me that they have removed my www.edinphoto.org.uk web site completely from their servers. That's what I asked them to do.

3. Fasthosts tell me that they have removed FPSEs from the domain. That's also what I wanted.

4. I have removed 'FrontPage' themes from my site.

5. I tried to publish from C:\edinphoto but got the message: "Cannot open frontpg.lck. No such file or folder" each time I tried to publish the site.

6. I searched for information about this error on Google, and it appears to be a permissioning error that occurs when one of the files that is needed for FPSEs cannot be accessed. But I don't want to use FPSEs. Is there something esle that I should change on the web site to make it clear to Expression Web that I do not want to use FPSEs?

7. (SURPRISE!): I tried to publish what should be an identilcal copy of the same web site, stored elsewhere on the same drive, at C:\edinphoto_saved\edinphoto_2008_10_01.

This time I did NOT get the "frontpg.lck" error, and publshing has begun. The publishing is now just beginning to retrieve pages from my local site at a rate that looks as if it may take about 12 to 24 hours to complete the publishing.

Does anybody have any comments on the above?

Thanks.

- Peter.

(in reply to Peter)
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>

All Forums >> Web Development >> Microsoft FrontPage Help >> Is my site too large for FrontPage - Should I move to Dreamweaver?
Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to: 1





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts