|
preludeok95 -> RE: MP3 (12/24/2001 22:56:38)
|
ooohhh darn...another "ps"... I was on SmartComputing and found something called MP3 Cutter. Sent an e-maill..and they were kind enough to reply with the following..which has enough technical info to possibly generate some discussion. "MP3Cutter is not really an editor. In fact it's some sort of scissors that can only cut up a MP3. I won't go into (technical) details, but the bottomline is that a MP3 consists of a stream of packets called "Frames". My program is able to cut a portion out of a MP3 between two user selectable frames. So there's no need to decode and re-encode a MP3 using this technique, this way the cut part will retain the original MP3 quality. If one would decode the MP3, edit it with a sound-editor and re-encode it to MP3 some of the quality would be lost (maybe minor, but still). With MP3Cutter you don't need a decoder and/or an en-coder. If you want to put a (short) MP3 on a web-page you'll have to make it as small as possible otherwise some users with slow internet connection would be getting annoyed. So make sure the MP3 has the lowest possible bitrate and the least number of channels (mono) for its purpose. Ie. you won't need a 128 kbit/s bitrate and a 44100 Hz samplerate stereo MP3 if there's just a human voice saying, for instance, "Welcome to my site". The human voice only uses the frequency spectrum of 300-3000 Hz, so a sampling-rate of about 8000 Hz (8 kHz) would be sufficient. And since we people aren't able to speak in stereo, mono is also good enough. Once the source (unencoded) file sounds nice, you'll have to figure out what the lowest bitrate of a MP3 is for the sound to be acceptable. The only way of doing this is by trial and error; just encode the same source a number of times with different bitrates and compare the results." soo....there it is..out on the table...any takers Did I do that?
|
|
|
|