Why do I need spooky if I can do this:

To apply permissions to a subweb:

Open the subweb in FP Explorer.
Go to Tools/Permissions. (In FrontPage 2000 Tools/Security/Permissions.)
Check "use unique permissions for this web."
Click "Apply."
If you want to restrict browse access, click the "Users" tab.
Check "only registered users have browse access."
Click "add."
Add user and password.
Repeat the "add" command for all users you with to add.

Yeah, I know I am and always will be a newbie .

Thanks for your time

-Gen

------------------
I am a survivor.
I'm going to make it.
Not going to give up.
I'm a survivor.
Going to work harder.

Something-Fishy

[This message has been edited by decorusvita (edited 07-05-2001).]

But what if I only want to give access to the people that work at my company?

Thanks,
Genny

------------------
I am a survivor.
I'm going to make it.
Not going to give up.
I'm a survivor.
Going to work harder.

Something-Fishy

Gen

------------------
I am a survivor.
I'm going to make it.
Not going to give up.
I'm a survivor.
Going to work harder.

Something-Fishy

quote:

---

Why do I need spooky if I can do this:

---

You can't do that on NT - you need Spooky's login. And apart from his login everyone needs Spooky anyway

------------------
Katherine

InKK Design
LinKKs - Kilkenny's Online Magazine

-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
"Dogs have owners, cats have staff!"

[This message has been edited by abbeyvet (edited 07-06-2001).]

quote:

---

Originally posted by decorusvita:
Okay... but FYI.... I am on NT.

---

Oh
Those steps looked like a method of setting up a secure web for Unix, obviously you must have admin status?

But anyway, the difference is web based administration vs FP based admin.

My login is page protection vs directory (web) protection via FP

The login is a little more flexible when it comes to specifying different levels of permission, whereas FP is one level only.

Then you get the registration / send password extras as well.

So the application is perhaps slightly different.