|
| |
|
|
WRXSTi
Posts: 30
Joined: 2/7/2002
From: MA USA
Status: offline
 |
RE: review of logo - 4/5/2002 21:02:24
image 1 on link 1.
Me
|
|
|
|
marcusw
Posts: 9
Joined: 4/6/2002
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline
|
RE: review of logo - 4/9/2002 12:33:12
I agree. Image 1 on link 1 is by far the best
| |
|
|
|
bobby
Posts: 11394
Joined: 8/15/1969
From: Seattle WA USA
Status: offline
|
RE: review of logo - 4/9/2002 13:02:54
I agreen with the above, however the #2 logo on link #2 is pretty good too... and the logo's on link #2 could be used in a variety of colors for different pages or content...
Nice design work...
| |
|
|
|
tdg
Posts: 53
Joined: 2/14/2002
From: Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
Status: offline
|
RE: review of logo - 4/10/2002 7:33:41
I agree that both are well conceived. However, graphic number two [B&W] is much easier to read, at first glance, IMHO. In other words I had to stop and focus on graphic number one, to determine its message.
Tom G, Sr.
| |
|
|
|
Kokomo
Posts: 114
Joined: 2/27/2002
From: Not far from here
Status: offline
|
RE: review of logo - 4/10/2002 12:35:35
Image 1 on link 1 has my vote too. The B/W logo is a bit easier to read, but it is not as "eye-catching" as the other one.
| |
|
|
|
smy2
Posts: 52
Joined: 3/22/2002
From: Juiz de Fora Minas Gerais Brazil
Status: offline
|
RE: review of logo - 4/10/2002 21:54:50
Yes, link 1, logo 1. Very nice.
What did you use to make these logos?
| |
|
 New Messages |
 No New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
 Locked w/ New Messages |
 Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|
Printable Version 
