navigation
a webmaster learning community
     Home    Register     Search      Help      Login    
Sponsors

Shopping Cart Software
Ecommerce software integrated into Frontpage, Dreamweaver and Golive templates. No monthly fees and available in ASP and PHP versions.

Website Templates
We also have a wide selection of Dreamweaver, Expression Web and Frontpage templates as well as webmaster tools and CSS layouts.

Frontpage website templates
Creative Website Templates for FrontPage, Dreamweaver, Flash, SwishMax

Search Forums
 

Advanced search
Recent Posts

 Todays Posts
 Most Active posts
 Posts since last visit
 My Recent Posts
 Mark posts read

 

Thumbnail vs. html

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
Printable Version 

All Forums >> Web Design >> Web Graphics >> Thumbnail vs. html
Page: [1]
 
Scotty

 

Posts: 209
From: The left coast-go Obama-
Status: offline

 
Thumbnail vs. html - 4/21/2002 16:11:34   
I've heard there are advantages to using html to link from a small photo, (say, on your product page), to a larger one. (Same photo, bigger size). Currently, I import the large photo to the product page, then hit the "thumbnail" on the tool bar at the bottom of the screen, then save. Which is better? Regards, Scotty

Jego

 

Posts: 551
From: Near Brampton, Ontario, Canada
Status: offline

 
RE: Thumbnail vs. html - 4/21/2002 22:52:37   
Same thing, Scotty. Your way is fine.

You *can* check to see you're getting the best crunching you can though, by right-clicking the thumbnail and checking its properties....ie. file size. If you do a test of both ways, you can then have a comparison to see which is smaller. However, autothumbnailing saves tons of time, so..."if it ain't broke, don't fix it."

In certain instances, autothumbnailing will compress too much (depending on what you're using the thumbnails for and what degree of compression is acceptable for the site), in which case you might be forced to create your own.

Jego



(in reply to Scotty)
Charles W Davis

 

Posts: 1725
Joined: 3/7/2002
From: Henderson Nevada USA
Status: offline

 
RE: Thumbnail vs. html - 4/22/2002 0:18:03   
Scotty,

You can change the sixe of the thumbnails. Go to Tools>Page Options and click the Auto Thumbnail tab. Set the size you want in pixels.

Enjoy!


(in reply to Scotty)
Scotty

 

Posts: 209
From: The left coast-go Obama-
Status: offline

 
RE: Thumbnail vs. html - 4/23/2002 1:28:01   
Jego; can you explain what you mean by "what degree of comression is acceptable for the site?

Charles; thanks for the reminder on being able to resize thumbnails. I'd never used it, so forgot it was there.

Regards, Scotty


(in reply to Scotty)
Jego

 

Posts: 551
From: Near Brampton, Ontario, Canada
Status: offline

 
RE: Thumbnail vs. html - 4/26/2002 13:19:33   
Sorry Scotty...missed getting back to this post.

FP has its own compression factor when making thumbnails (anyone know what percentage it is?). Some pictures compress better than others. Depending on what you're making the thumbnails of, they may look "okay" or they may look kind of crappy. Most times they look perfectly acceptable. Again, depends on "what" the picture is and how much detail you'd like (or need) to see in the smaller version of the pic.

Jego






(in reply to Scotty)
Page:   [1]

All Forums >> Web Design >> Web Graphics >> Thumbnail vs. html
Page: [1]
Jump to: 1





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts