|
| |
|
|
webbedfeet
Posts: 32 Joined: 6/7/2002 From: Rochester NY USA Status: offline
|
I know this has soooo much room for improvement - 9/18/2002 15:25:27
Could you look at my site? I think it is basically ok, but I know that it doesn' t look completely right. Too much white and all. Well, I will leave the suggestions to you all. Please be specific about how to make changes, as I am an amatuer at this. http://www.susanjohn.com [:j]
_____________________________
Quack!
|
|
|
|
search66
Posts: 24 Joined: 9/10/2002 Status: offline
|
RE: I know this has soooo much room for improvement - 9/19/2002 10:02:01
I like the site, but I' m weird about the Times font. I perfer an Ariel or even Verdana. That' s my first " gripe" . The ONLY other thing I noticed that was a bit quirky, was on the " contact me" page. The font/paragraph spacing was a bit off. You might want to buffer your table with 5 pixels each way.
_____________________________
http://www.netjak.com for the gamer by the gamer
|
|
|
|
webbedfeet
Posts: 32 Joined: 6/7/2002 From: Rochester NY USA Status: offline
|
RE: I know this has soooo much room for improvement - 9/20/2002 8:05:16
Thank you for the replies. I fixed the contact us page, I hope. Please let me know. Anyway, I am starting to use more ariel fonts and such, so that may look more pleasing. For the 2nd post, I don' t know if that is just how the jpeg came out, but it is way too squished and I like the picture on the left. I also, am not crazy about that top navigation bar. I had it in there before, but felt it changed the atmosphere of the page. I will look at putting it back in somehow. Well, please keep looking and suggesting! Thank you.
_____________________________
Quack!
|
|
|
|
webbedfeet
Posts: 32 Joined: 6/7/2002 From: Rochester NY USA Status: offline
|
RE: I know this has soooo much room for improvement - 9/22/2002 13:30:30
Thanks all. I changed the font on the home page, and the picture. The vote in 2000 general election at the bottom of the bio is not telling people TO vote it is telling people what the vote was in 2000, ie how many votes she and her opponents got. Any other suggestions? Thanks again.
_____________________________
Quack!
|
|
|
|
_gail
Posts: 2876 From: So FL Status: offline
|
RE: RE: I know this has soooo much room for improvement - 9/22/2002 13:59:34
quote:
The vote in 2000 general election at the bottom of the bio is not telling people TO vote it is telling people what the vote was in 2000, ie how many votes she and her opponents got. Any other suggestions? Yes, I' d suggest you improve the wording, something like " Votes in the 2000 General Election" or " Total (or Final) Votes in the 2000 General Election." VOTE could very well be understood as an action verb, not a plural noun as is intended. It wouldn' t hurt either to clarify the statistics by adding the word " votes' to the numbers. eg. 19,328 votes, etc. Believe me, not everyone will read the text under this boldfaced subtitle but they may see the subtitle. In my opinion, as written, the wording is wide open to misinterpretation. If it were my campaign, I would not want to chance it! gail
< Message edited by _gail -- 9/21/2002 2:00:50 PM >
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|